ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2021
Earth as construction material in the circular economy context: practitioner perspectives on barriers to overcome.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stabilization of compressed earth blocks using recycled thermoplastics: experimental study of key parameters.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bio-inspired 3D-printed earthen materials and structures.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of Compressed Earth Blocks Stabilized with Recycled Cement.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bio-Based Stabilization of Natural Soil for Rammed Earth Construction: A Review on Mechanical and Water Durability Performance.Polymers · 2025Review
- The zero-emissions resource pool: construction materials compatible with a realistic view of delivering zero-emissions in the UK by 2050.Architecture, structures and construction · 2025Review
- Adsorption Dynamics of Disodium Octaborate Tetrahydrate on Clay Minerals: Implications for Construction Wood Protection.Small methods · 2025Article
- Adobe Bricks of the Champagne Region (France): Characterization of a Chalky Raw Earth Construction Material.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Manually compressed soil blocks stabilised by fly ash based geopolymer: a promising approach for sustainable buildings.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Biomineralisation to Increase Earth Infrastructure Resilience.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Soil-derived Nature's Contributions to People and their contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- The role of soils in delivering Nature's Contributions to People.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The need for a vast quantity of new buildings to address the increase in population and living standards is opposed to the need for tackling global warming and the decline in biodiversity. To overcome this twofold challenge, there is a need to move towards a more circular economy by widely using a combination of alternative low-carbon construction materials, alternative technologies and practices. Soils or earth were widely used by builders before World War II, as a primary resource to manufacture materials and structures of vernacular architecture. Centuries of empirical practices have led to a variety of techniques to implement earth, known as rammed earth, cob and adobe masonry among others. Earth refers to local soil with a variable composition but at least containing a small percentage of clay that would simply solidify by drying without any baking. This paper discusses why and how earth naturally embeds high-tech properties for sustainable construction. Then the potential of earth to contribute to addressing the global challenge of modern architecture and the need to re-think building practices is also explored. The current obstacles against the development of earthen architecture are examined through a survey of current earth building practitioners in Western Europe. A literature review revealed that, surprisingly, only technical barriers are being addressed by the scientific community; two-thirds of the actual barriers identified by the interviewees are not within the technical field and are almost entirely neglected in the scientific literature, which may explain why earthen architecture is still a niche market despite embodying all the attributes of the best construction material to tackle the current climate and economic crisis. This article is part of the theme issue 'The role of soils in delivering Nature's Contributions to People'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.