Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34365808›Full record

ReviewHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2021

SPRINT-A Kidney-Centric Narrative Review: Recent Advances in Hypertension.

Austin H Hu, Tara I Chang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Austin H HuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Tara I ChangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4691-1681
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN ACADEMIC NEPHROLOGYT32DK007357 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHERTOW, GLENN MATTHEW · 1986 to 2022
$4.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is a potent cardiovascular risk factor with deleterious end-organ effects and is especially prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease. The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) enrolled patients at an elevated cardiac risk including patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease and found that an intensive systolic blood pressure goal of <120 mm Hg significantly reduced the rates of adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality and nonsignificantly reduced the rates of probable dementia; these results were consistent whether one had chronic kidney disease or not. However, results of intensive blood pressure therapy on chronic kidney disease progression were inconclusive, and there was an increased risk of incident chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury, but the declines in kidney function appear to be hemodynamically driven and reversible. Overall, an intensive blood pressure target is effective in reducing cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and may reduce the risk of probable dementia in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease. More studies are needed to determine its long-term effects on kidney function.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSystoleblood pressurecardiovascular diseasesdementiahypertensionmortalityrenal insufficiency, chronic

Identifiers

PMID34365808
PMCPMC8575127
OpenAlexW3187086431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.