ArticleThe plant pathology journal2021
Comparison of Bacterial Community of Healthy and Erwinia amylovora Infected Apples.
Article in The plant pathology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A field-based study of phyllosphere mycobiomes in apple orchards under varying agricultural management strategies.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Intercropping between persimmon and apple enriched the leaf endophytes and rhizosphere communities against apple root rot.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Analysis of Bacterial Community Changes in Apple Trees Treated with Bacillus altitudinis KPB25, a Potential Biological Control Agent against Fire Blight.The plant pathology journal · 2025Article
- Efficacy ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Design and Evaluation of Synthetic Microbial Communities for Effective Fire Blight Disease Control in Apples.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Dynamics of Bacterial Communities by Apple Tissue: Implications for Apple Health.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Effects of above ground pathogen infection and fungicide application on the root-associated microbiota of apple saplings.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- Mycobiota community and fungal species response to development stage and fire blight disease in apples.AIMS microbiology · 2023Article
- Microbiota Communities of Healthy and Bacterial Pustule Diseased Soybean.The plant pathology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fire blight disease, caused by Erwinia amylovora, could damage rosaceous plants such as apples, pears, and raspberries. In this study, we designed to understand how E. amylovora affected other bacterial communities on apple rhizosphere; twig and fruit endosphere; and leaf, and fruit episphere. Limited studies on the understanding of the microbial community of apples and changes the community structure by occurrence of the fire blight disease were conducted. As result of these experiments, the infected trees had low species richness and operational taxonomic unit diversity when compared to healthy trees. Rhizospheric bacterial communities were stable regardless of infection. But the communities in endosphere and episphere were significanlty affected by E. amylovora infection. We also found that several metabolic pathways differ significantly between infected and healthy trees. In particular, we observed differences in sugar metabolites. The finding provides that sucrose metabolites are important for colonization of E. amylovora in host tissue. Our results provide fundamental information on the microbial community structures between E. amylovora infected and uninfected trees, which will contribute to developing novel control strategies for the fire blight disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.