ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2021
On the prediction of neuronal microscale topology descriptors based on mesoscale recordings.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- WhenAPL bioengineering · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The brain possesses structural and functional hierarchical architectures organized over multiple scales. Considering that functional recordings commonly focused on a single spatial level, and because multiple scales interact with one another, we explored the behaviour of in silico neuronal networks across different scales. We established ad hoc relations of several topological descriptors (average clustering coefficient, average path length, small-world propensity, modularity, network degree, synchronizability and fraction of long-term connections) between different scales upon application and empirical validation of a Euclidian renormalization approach. We tested a simple network (distance-dependent model) as well as an artificial cortical network (Vertex; undirected and directed networks) finding the same qualitative power law relations of the parameters across levels: their quantitative nature is model dependent. Those findings were then organized in a workflow that can be used to predict, with approximation, microscale topologies from mesoscale recordings. The present manuscript not only presents a theoretical framework for the renormalization of biological neuronal network and their study across scales in light of the spatial features of the recording method but also proposes an applicable workflow to compare real functional networks across scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.