ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2021
Rational combination of an immune checkpoint inhibitor with CSF1R inhibitor-loaded nanoparticle enhances anticancer efficacy.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanomaterial-Enabled Modulation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Dendritic Cells to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Preclinical Nanoparticle Approaches Targeting Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Breast Cancer: From Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Deep Tumor Penetration Using Nanoparticle Delivery Systems: Programmed Design Strategies and Emerging Evaluation Platforms.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Enhancing cancer immunotherapy: Nanotechnology-mediated immunotherapy overcoming immunosuppression.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024Review
- A landscape of recent advances in lipid nanoparticles and their translational potential for the treatment of solid tumors.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Review
- Targeting immune checkpoints on tumor-associated macrophages in tumor immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Recent Advances and Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2022Review
- Nanocarriers for pancreatic cancer imaging, treatments, and immunotherapies.Theranostics · 2022Review
- Overcoming transport barrier to immunotherapies.Drug delivery and translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, rapid strides have been made in the realm of cancer immunotherapy. Of the abundance of infiltrating immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), macrophages contribute a significant portion and make up to 50% of the tumor mass. In addition to this, the relative plasticity of macrophages makes it an attractive target to modulate macrophage functions to initiate an anti-tumor response. However, many challenges hinder this strategy. Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF) secreted by cancer cells binds to the colony-stimulating factor receptor present on macrophages and negatively influences macrophage functions. MCSF, along with a cocktail of immunosuppressive cytokines present in the TME, polarizes macrophages to an immunosuppressive pro-tumorigenic M2-like phenotype. M2-like macrophages dampen tumor response and are known to be associated with increased tumor progression and metastasis. Indeed, clinical interventions aimed to reprogram macrophage response from an M2-like tumor aiding phenotype to an M1-like tumor-killing phenotype using small-molecule inhibitors of the CSF1R axis have gathered much attention in the recent past. However, poor response and systemic toxicities observed in these therapies necessitate alternative therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, another key signaling pathway that has been recently implicated in aiding the CSF1R signaling in TAMs is the PDL1 signaling axis. Hence, in this study, we designed a self-assembled lipid nanoparticle system encompassing a potent small-molecule inhibitor of the CSF1R signaling axis, while the surface of the nanoparticle was tethered with anti-PDL1 mAb. The purpose of this is twofold; the nanoparticles can deliver the cargo in a targeted manner to PDL1 expressing M2-like macrophages while simultaneously blocking the receptor. The resulting nanoparticle system termed α-PDL1-CSF-LNP showed enhanced repolarization of M2 like macrophages in vitro while also upregulating the phagocytic index. Furthermore, suboptimal dose administration of α-PDL1-CSF-LNP in an aggressive melanoma mouse model resulted in superior anti-tumor efficacy with minimal toxicities. These results were validated by ex vivo mechanistic analysis showing that TAMs have successfully been repolarized to a predominantly M1-like phenotype. This, along with increased tumor infiltration of CD8+ T cells, worked in synergy to provide an effective anti-tumor strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.