SynthesisHeart and vessels2022
Clinical significance of chronic myocarditis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in patients with chronic inflammatory cardiomyopathy: a multicenter randomized study (HYPIC trial).BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Mesalazine-Induced Myocarditis: A Challenging Diagnostic Journey.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic myocarditis is a prolonged inflammatory condition in the myocardium and its histological manifestation is defined by the presence of an inflammatory infiltrate. Chronic myocarditis has not been well known and its treatment of chronic myocarditis has not been established. Primary outcome of this study was to assess the efficacy of immunomodulatory treatment in addition to conventional treatment, and secondary outcomes were to clarity the prognosis of natural history of chronic myocarditis and incidence of chronic myocarditis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We searched for studies in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi published between January 1946 and June 2020. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis revealed that patients receiving immunomodulatory treatment showed an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after immunomodulatory treatment compared to the control group (hazard ratio, 16.65; confidence interval, 4.55-28.74; p = 0.007). Five-year survival rate of the patients with inflammatory DCM (iDCM) and DCM was 52.7-70.3% and 51.9-91.1%, respectively. Moreover, 51.5%-62.7% of patients with DCM met the criteria of iDCM. Our systematic review revealed that patients with chronic myocarditis had poor prognosis and immunomodulatory treatment was significantly effective in addition to conventional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.