ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2021
Variability in clinical and neurophysiological evaluation of pain development following acute spinal cord injury: a case report.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small Fibre Pathology in Fibromyalgia: A review.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Assessing the Feasibility of a Multimodal Approach to Pain Evaluation in Early Stages after Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic neuropathic pain (NeP) often develops following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). This case report explores variability in clinical and neurophysiological aspects of pain evaluation in early post-trauma stages. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year old female presenting with acute incomplete sensorimotor tetraplegia C4 AIS D was examined by neurological examination and pain assessment at three time points after acute trauma T1 (8 weeks), T2 (11 weeks), and T3 (24 weeks). Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) were measured above (control area), at (area of NeP), and below (foot) the neurological level of injury (NLI). Musculo-skeletal and neuropathic pain were clinically present already during T1 but showed variations in localization and occurrence over time. Neuropathic pain classification varied between time points due to shifting of NLI. Above-level QST revealed minor, less pronounced abnormalities similar to at-level site. At-level QST (site of NeP) showed loss for thermal and mechanical detection thresholds but also gain of function for mechanical pain thresholds with a tendency of amelioration over time. QST below-level did not reveal remarkable changes over time. LEPs above- and below-level were within normal limits. At-level LEPs abolished after T1. DISCUSSION: In early stages post injury (up to 6 month) variations in pain presentation for both, musculo-skeletal and neuropathic pain as well as QST and LEP could be demonstrated. These findings suggest ongoing adaption mechanisms in sensory pathways, which require further exploration and may be relevant for prognostic and preventive strategies against the development of chronic neuropathic and nociceptive pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.