Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34364670›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cardiac failure2021

Rate Versus Rhythm Control in Heart Failure Patients with Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery.

Eunice Yang, David Spragg, Steven Schulman, Nisha A Gilotra, Ahmet Kilic, Rawn Salenger, Glenn Whitman, Thomas S Metkus

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cardiac failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The heart rate response to the 6-min walk test in atrial fibrillation patients with or without beta-blockers: Referring to patients with sinus rhythm.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eunice YangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.
David SpraggDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.
Steven SchulmanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.
Nisha A GilotraDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.
Ahmet KilicDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.
Rawn SalengerDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Glenn WhitmanDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD.
Thomas S MetkusDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD. Electronic address: tmetkus1@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003099 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GEBO, KELLY A · 2019 to 2023
$7.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether rhythm control for post-operative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (POAF) is superior to rate control in patients with heart failure or systolic dysfunction (HF) is not known.

methodsWe performed a post-hoc analysis of a trial by the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network, which randomized patients with POAF after cardiac surgery to rate control or rhythm control with amiodarone/cardioversion. We assessed subgroups of trial participants defined by heart failure/cardiomyopathy history or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%. We conducted a stratified analysis in patients with and without HF to explore outcomes of rhythm versus rate control strategy.

resultsOf 523 subjects with POAF after cardiac surgery, 131 (25%) had HF. 49% of HF patients were randomized to rhythm control. In HF patients, rhythm control was associated with less atrial fibrillation within the first 7 days. There were no differences in rhythm at 30- and 60-day follow-up. In the HF group, there were significantly more subjects with AF < 48 hours in the rhythm control group compared to rate control group- 68.8% compared to 46.3%, P=0.009. By comparison, in the non-HF stratum, 54.4% of the rate control group had AF < 48 hours compared to 63.5% of the rhythm control group (P=0.067).), though there was no significant interaction of heart failure with cardiac rhythm at 7 days (Pinteraction 0.16).

conclusionRhythm control for HF patients with POAF after cardiac surgery increases early restoration of sinus rhythm. Rate and rhythm control are both reasonable for HF patients with AF after cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCardiac Surgical ProceduresHeart FailureHeart RateHumansStroke VolumeVentricular Function, Leftatrial fibrillationCardiac surgeryheart failureraterhythm

Identifiers

PMID34364670
PMCPMC8363110
OpenAlexW3192294471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.