Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34364404›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Public health2021

Outbreaks of COVID-19 variants in US prisons: a mathematical modelling analysis of vaccination and reopening policies.

Theresa Ryckman, Elizabeth T Chin, Lea Prince, David Leidner, Elizabeth Long, David M Studdert, Joshua A Salomon, Fernando Alarid-Escudero, Jason R Andrews, Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 Burden in Adult Correctional or Detention Facilities and the Surrounding Communities, January 1, 2020-July 20, 2021.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 dynamics in an Ohio prison.Frontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Among Incarcerated Adult Men in Quebec, Canada, 2021.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Theresa RyckmanStanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: tessryckman@gmail.com.
Elizabeth T ChinDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lea PrinceStanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
David LeidnerCalifornia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
Elizabeth LongStanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
David M StuddertStanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, USA.
Joshua A SalomonStanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Fernando Alarid-EscuderoDivision of Public Administration, Center for Research and Teaching in Economics, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Jason R AndrewsDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Jeremy D Goldhaber-FiebertStanford Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR37DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS K OWENS · 2019 to 2026
$6.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA015612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidents of prisons have experienced disproportionate COVID-19-related health harms. To control outbreaks, many prisons in the USA restricted in-person activities, which are now resuming even as viral variants proliferate. This study aims to use mathematical modelling to assess the risks and harms of COVID-19 outbreaks in prisons under a range of policies, including resumption of activities.

methodsWe obtained daily resident-level data for all California state prisons from Jan 1, 2020, to May 15, 2021, describing prison layouts, housing status, sociodemographic and health characteristics, participation in activities, and COVID-19 testing, infection, and vaccination status. We developed a transmission-dynamic stochastic microsimulation parameterised by the California data and published literature. After an initial infection is introduced to a prison, the model evaluates the effect of various policy scenarios on infections and hospitalisations over 200 days. Scenarios vary by vaccine coverage, baseline immunity (0%, 25%, or 50%), resumption of activities, and use of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) that reduce transmission by 75%. We simulated five prison types that differ by residential layout and demographics, and estimated outcomes with and without repeated infection introductions over the 200 days.

findingsIf a viral variant is introduced into a prison that has resumed pre-2020 contact levels, has moderate vaccine coverage (ranging from 36% to 76% among residents, dependent on age, with 40% coverage for staff), and has no baseline immunity, 23-74% of residents are expected to be infected over 200 days. High vaccination coverage (90%) coupled with NPIs reduces cumulative infections to 2-54%. Even in prisons with low room occupancies (ie, no more than two occupants) and low levels of cumulative infections (ie, <10%), hospitalisation risks are substantial when these prisons house medically vulnerable populations. Risks of large outbreaks (>20% of residents infected) are substantially higher if infections are repeatedly introduced.

interpretationBalancing benefits of resuming activities against risks of outbreaks presents challenging trade-offs. After achieving high vaccine coverage, prisons with mostly one-to-two-person cells that have higher baseline immunity from previous outbreaks can resume in-person activities with low risk of a widespread new outbreak, provided they maintain widespread NPIs, continue testing, and take measures to protect the medically vulnerable.

fundingHorowitz Family Foundation, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Science Foundation, Open Society Foundation, Advanced Micro Devices.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksPrisonsAdolescentAdultAgedCaliforniaCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalOrganizational PolicyRisk AssessmentSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34364404
PMCPMC8342313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.