Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34364379›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Palliative care providers' use of digital health and perspectives on technological innovation: a national study.

Jason Mills, Jennifer Fox, Raechel Damarell, Jennifer Tieman, Patsy Yates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Palliative care and social practice · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason MillsCentre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4061, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5584-5225
Jennifer FoxCentre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4061, Australia. jennifer.fox@qut.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9060-0143
Raechel DamarellCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6737-7537
Jennifer TiemanCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-1900
Patsy YatesCentre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4061, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8946-8504

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the need for digital health capability and technological innovation in palliative care services is growing rapidly, relatively little is known about the current uptake and views of individual palliative care practitioners. This study aims to explore palliative care practitioners' current use of and perspectives on digital health innovation in palliative care.

methodsA descriptive cross-sectional survey with a web-based questionnaire was used. Participants were multidisciplinary palliative care practitioners in Australia.

resultsSurveys were returned by 170 medical, nursing, and allied health practitioners working in palliative care. Most respondents reported using a variety of digital health technology associated with clinical information systems, mobile devices, SMS text messaging, teleconferencing, and Wi-Fi. These technologies were used for the purpose of communicating with other health professionals, accessing web-based or mobile health palliative care resources, collecting or managing patient data, and providing information or education. However, few reported electronic access to patients' advance care planning documentation or could update these data. Respondents were moderately confident in their ability to use digital health, held positive beliefs that palliative care could be enhanced through digital health, and were generally supportive of ongoing innovation through digitally-enable models of care. Palliative care providers would most like to see digital health innovations in the areas of client health records, telehealth, and personal health tracking.

conclusionThis is the first national study of digital health in Australian palliative care providers. It contributes new knowledge in this important area of palliative care practice to guide policy and education, whilst informing future directions for research.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleDigital healthInnovationPalliative careSurveyTechnology

Identifiers

PMID34364379
PMCPMC8349145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.