ArticleSexual medicine2021
Examination of Treatment Duration, Treatment Success and Obstetric Results According to the Vaginismus Grades.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patients' recommendations to improve help-seeking for vaginismus: a qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn patients with vaginismus, the treatment becomes more challenging and the treatment may take longer as the grade of vaginismus is higher or worsens. However, the differences regarding treatment duration, success, and treatment methods by grades are not evident in the literature.
aimThe aim of this study is to answer the question, "Does the number of treatment sessions, dilator requirement, treatment success, pre-& post-treatment FSFI scores and obstetric results of vaginismus patients change depending on the vaginismus-grade?"
methodsThe patients were divided into 4 grades according to the Lamont classification. They underwent stepwise treatment sessions by a single gynecologist. Treatment success, duration of treatment, mechanical dilator requirement, duration from marriage, pre- and post-treatment FSFI scores, pregnancy rates, and delivery types were compared between patients at different grades.
main outcome measuresAssessment of the differences between vaginismus-grades by comparing clinical observations and FSFI-scores.
resultsPain-free sexual intercourse occurred in 85 (93.4%) of 91 primary-vaginismus patients included in our study. The success rate was 100% in grade 1, 95.2% in grade 2, 92.1% in grade 3, and 92% in grade 4. Treatment session durations of the patients differed significantly by grades (P < .05). Same way the duration from marriage at the time of application differed significantly by the grade (P < .05). While there was a significant relationship between vaginismus grade and dilator requirement, there was no significant relationship between vaginismus grade and delivery type (P < .05). 54.5% of 44 patients, who got pregnant, delivered by cesarean-section. There was a significant increase in FSFI scores in all groups in the pre- and post-treatment third month (P < ,05).
conclusionPatients should be notified that as the grades of vaginismus progress, the duration of the treatment may extend, and its success may decrease, the requirement for mechanical dilators will increase in the advanced grade, and the grade may progress as the application period for treatment is delayed. Kiremitli S, Kiremitli T. Examination of Treatment Duration, Treatment Success and Obstetric Results According to the Vaginismus Grades. Sex Med 2021;9:100407.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.