Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34364024›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2021

Specificity of plasma oxytocin immunoassays: A comparison of commercial assays and sample preparation techniques using oxytocin knockout and wildtype mice.

Gitanjali E Gnanadesikan, Elizabeth A D Hammock, Stacey R Tecot, C Sue Carter, Evan L MacLean

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Close encounters with oxytocin.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sex, love and oxytocin: Two metaphors and a molecule.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Oxytocin-a social peptide? Deconstructing the evidence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Oxytocin and oxygen: the evolution of a solution to the 'stress of life'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Oxytocin and love: Myths, metaphors and mysteries.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gitanjali E GnanadesikanSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. Electronic address: gitag@email.arizona.edu.
Elizabeth A D HammockDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Stacey R TecotSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; Laboratory for the Evolutionary Endocrinology of Primates, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
C Sue CarterKinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Evan L MacLeanSchool of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; Psychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA; College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
University of Arizona · USFlorida State University · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Neural mechanisms of infant attachmentR01MH114994 · NIMH · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMOCK, ELIZABETH A.D. · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Oxytocin Pathways and the Health Effects of Human-Animal InteractionR21HD095217 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MACLEAN, EVAN, TECOT, STACEY ROBYN · 2018 to 2019
$437k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD095217NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxytocin has garnered much interest due to its role in affective states, social behaviors, and diverse physiological functions. However, approaches for measuring endogenous oxytocin concentrations have generated considerable controversy and debate. Common procedures for measuring oxytocin often produce uncorrelated results, and the detected concentrations frequently vary across two orders of magnitude. These findings have led some researchers to argue that immunoassays of plasma oxytocin may be unreliable and nonspecific, particularly when samples are not first processed using an extraction procedure. Here, we assess the specificity of oxytocin immunoassays using plasma samples from wildtype (WT) and oxytocin knockout (KO) mice. Plasma samples from both genotypes were measured using immunoassay and were measured with or without a solid-phase extraction. Using a commercially available kit from Arbor Assays, we demonstrate that both techniques generate a clear contrast between genotypes, with wildtype samples containing high concentrations of oxytocin (unextracted mean = 468 pg/ml; extracted mean = 381 pg/ml), while knockout samples measured below the lower limit of detection. Analytical validations demonstrated good parallelism and spike recovery for both methods. Furthermore, the same wildtype samples measured with both procedures were highly correlated (r = 0.95), although unextracted samples measured at significantly higher concentrations (p = 2.0 ×10

Indexed as

ImmunoassayOxytocinPlasmaAnimalsBiological AssayMiceMice, KnockoutSpecimen HandlingOxytocinELISAExtractionImmunoassayKnockoutOxytocinSample matrix

Identifiers

PMID34364024
PMCPMC8487999
OpenAlexW3186165690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.