Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34363774›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Effect of antibiotic stewardship interventions in primary care on antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli bacteraemia in England (2013-18): a quasi-experimental, ecological, data linkage study.

Shirin Aliabadi, Philip Anyanwu, Elizabeth Beech, Elita Jauneikaite, Peter Wilson, Russell Hope, Azeem Majeed, Berit Muller-Pebody, Céire Costelloe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. A One Health Comparative Study of MDRAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An assessment of the downstream implications of blood culture collection and transit.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shirin AliabadiGlobal Digital Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Philip AnyanwuGlobal Digital Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Elizabeth BeechNHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK.
Elita JauneikaiteDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; School of Public Health, and National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Peter WilsonClinical Microbiology and Virology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Russell HopeDivision of Healthcare Associated and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Berit Muller-PebodyDivision of Healthcare Associated and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK.
Céire CostelloeGlobal Digital Health Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: ceire.costelloe@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBPublic Health England · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBNHS EnglandUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a major global health concern, driven by overuse of antibiotics. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a national antimicrobial stewardship intervention, the National Health Service (NHS) England Quality Premium implemented in 2015-16, on broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing and Escherichia coli bacteraemia resistance to broad-spectrum antibiotics in England.

methodsIn this quasi-experimental, ecological, data linkage study, we used longitudinal data on bacteraemia for patients registered with a general practitioner in the English National Health Service and patients with E coli bacteraemia notified to the national mandatory surveillance programme between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2018. We linked these data to data on antimicrobial susceptibility testing of E coli from Public Health England's Second-Generation Surveillance System. We did an ecological analysis using interrupted time-series analyses and generalised estimating equations to estimate the change in broad-spectrum antibiotics prescribing over time and the change in the proportion of E coli bacteraemia cases for which the causative bacteria were resistant to each antibiotic individually or to at least one of five broad-spectrum antibiotics (co-amoxiclav, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin), after implementation of the NHS England Quality Premium intervention in April, 2015.

findingsBefore implementation of the Quality Premium, the rate of antibiotic prescribing for all five broad-spectrum antibiotics was increasing at rate of 0·2% per month (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1·002 [95% CI 1·000-1·004], p=0·046). After implementation of the Quality Premium, an immediate reduction in total broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing rate was observed (IRR 0·867 [95% CI 0·837-0·898], p<0·0001). This effect was sustained until the end of the study period; a 57% reduction in rate of antibiotic prescribing was observed compared with the counterfactual situation (ie, had the Quality Premium not been implemented). In the same period, the rate of resistance to at least one broad-spectrum antibiotic increased at rate of 0·1% per month (IRR 1·001 [95% CI 0·999-1·003], p=0·346). On implementation of the Quality Premium, an immediate reduction in resistance rate to at least one broad-spectrum antibiotic was observed (IRR 0·947 [95% CI 0·918-0·977], p=0·0007). Although this effect was also sustained until the end of the study period, with a 12·03% reduction in resistance rate compared with the counterfactual situation, the overall trend remained on an upward trajectory. On examination of the long-term effect following implementation of the Quality Premium, there was an increase in the number of isolates resistant to at least one of the five broad-spectrum antibiotics tested (IRR 1·002 [1·000-1·003]; p=0·047).

interpretationAlthough interventions targeting antibiotic use can result in changes in resistance over a short period, they might be insufficient alone to curtail antimicrobial resistance.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research, Economic and Social Research Council, Rosetrees Trust, and The Stoneygate Trust.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipBacteremiaEnglandEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34363774
PMCPMC8612938
OpenAlexW3190488238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.