ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2021
Pan-cancer prediction of radiotherapy benefit using genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD): a cohort-based pooled analysis.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.
- Re-examining post-operative chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer: an updated long-term combined analysis of RTOG 9501/EORTC 22931.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Independent association of metabolic tumor response on FDG-PET with pulmonary toxicity following risk-adaptive chemoradiation for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: Inherent radiosensitivity or immune response?Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023Trial
- Outcomes Stratification of Head and Neck Cancer Using Pre- and Post-treatment DNA Methylation From Peripheral Blood.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023Trial
- Dose escalation based onRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Trial
- Pan-Cancer Gene Expression Predicts Per-Cancer Radiation Therapy Response.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Effective tumor kinetics inferred from single routine H&E biopsies enable counterfactual virtual radiotherapy trials.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Dynamic multimodal radiomic model for survival prediction in cervical cancer: a multi-cohort study.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Radiation Oncology-Biology Integration Network: Bridging the Gap between Biological Research and Clinical Practice.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Review
- Toward genomic personalization of breast cancer radiotherapy: foundations, challenges, and a roadmap for clinical integration.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy Technologists in Head and Neck Cancer: A Narrative Review and Operational Framework.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of radioresistance: decoding macrophage-driven radioprotective niches through temporal-spatial reprogramming.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Quality of life in cancer patients at the end of radiotherapy compared to a general population sample in Germany.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Genomic analysis of radiosensitivity in breast cancer : Identifying pathological determinants and assessing genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) for personalized dose escalation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Radiogenomics and the DNA damage response: opportunities for biomarker-guided radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Patterns of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Immediate Breast Reconstruction-Results From the iBRA-2 Cohort Study.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
- Personalised medicine through AI-enhanced integration of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy.European radiology experimental · 2025Review
- Mathematical Oncology: How Modeling Is Transforming Clinical Decision-Making.Cancer research · 2025Review
- Association Between Genomic Features and Radiation Response in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Palliative Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- From Semantic Modeling to Precision Radiotherapy: An AI Framework Linking Radiobiology, Oncology, and Public Health Integration.Biomedicines · 2025Review
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite advances in cancer genomics, radiotherapy is still prescribed on the basis of an empirical one-size-fits-all paradigm. Previously, we proposed a novel algorithm using the genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) model to personalise prescription of radiation dose on the basis of the biological effect of a given physical dose of radiation, calculated using individual tumour genomics. We hypothesise that GARD will reveal interpatient heterogeneity associated with opportunities to improve outcomes compared with physical dose of radiotherapy alone. We aimed to test this hypothesis and investigate the GARD-based radiotherapy dosing paradigm.
methodsWe did a pooled, pan-cancer analysis of 11 previously published clinical cohorts of unique patients with seven different types of cancer, which are all available cohorts with the data required to calculate GARD, together with clinical outcome. The included cancers were breast cancer, head and neck cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, endometrial cancer, melanoma, and glioma. Our dataset comprised 1615 unique patients, of whom 1298 (982 with radiotherapy, 316 without radiotherapy) were assessed for time to first recurrence and 677 patients (424 with radiotherapy and 253 without radiotherapy) were assessed for overall survival. We analysed two clinical outcomes of interest: time to first recurrence and overall survival. We used Cox regression, stratified by cohort, to test the association between GARD and outcome with separate models using dose of radiation and sham-GARD (ie, patients treated without radiotherapy, but modelled as having a standard-of-care dose of radiotherapy) for comparison. We did interaction tests between GARD and treatment (with or without radiotherapy) using the Wald statistic.
findingsPooled analysis of all available data showed that GARD as a continuous variable is associated with time to first recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 0·98 [95% CI 0·97-0·99]; p=0·0017) and overall survival (0·97 [0·95-0·99]; p=0·0007). The interaction test showed the effect of GARD on overall survival depends on whether or not that patient received radiotherapy (Wald statistic p=0·011). The interaction test for GARD and radiotherapy was not significant for time to first recurrence (Wald statistic p=0·22). The HR for physical dose of radiation was 0·99 (95% CI 0·97-1·01; p=0·53) for time to first recurrence and 1·00 (0·96-1·04; p=0·95) for overall survival. The HR for sham-GARD was 1·00 (0·97-1·03; p=1·00) for time to first recurrence and 1·00 (0·98-1·02; p=0·87) for overall survival.
interpretationThe biological effect of radiotherapy, as quantified by GARD, is significantly associated with time to first recurrence and overall survival for patients with cancer treated with radiation. It is predictive of radiotherapy benefit, and physical dose of radiation is not. We propose integration of genomics into radiation dosing decisions, using a GARD-based framework, as the new paradigm for personalising radiotherapy prescription dose.
fundingNone. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.