Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34363680›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2022

Tailored Bayes: a risk modeling framework under unequal misclassification costs.

Solon Karapanagiotis, Umberto Benedetto, Sach Mukherjee, Paul D W Kirk, Paul J Newcombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Solon KarapanagiotisMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK and The Alan Turing Institute, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4460-2073
Umberto BenedettoBristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, UK.
Sach MukherjeeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany and MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Paul D W KirkMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Paul J NewcombeMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/13Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/16Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/9Medical Research Council MR/R014019/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk prediction models are a crucial tool in healthcare. Risk prediction models with a binary outcome (i.e., binary classification models) are often constructed using methodology which assumes the costs of different classification errors are equal. In many healthcare applications, this assumption is not valid, and the differences between misclassification costs can be quite large. For instance, in a diagnostic setting, the cost of misdiagnosing a person with a life-threatening disease as healthy may be larger than the cost of misdiagnosing a healthy person as a patient. In this article, we present Tailored Bayes (TB), a novel Bayesian inference framework which "tailors" model fitting to optimize predictive performance with respect to unbalanced misclassification costs. We use simulation studies to showcase when TB is expected to outperform standard Bayesian methods in the context of logistic regression. We then apply TB to three real-world applications, a cardiac surgery, a breast cancer prognostication task, and a breast cancer tumor classification task and demonstrate the improvement in predictive performance over standard methods.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsModels, StatisticalBayes TheoremComputer SimulationFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsBayesian inferenceBinary classificationMisclassification costsTailored Bayesian methods

Identifiers

PMID34363680
PMCPMC9748575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.