Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2021
Gilteritinib versus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with FLT3-mutated relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of FLT3 inhibitors in monotherapy of hematological and solid malignancies: a systemic analysis of clinical trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Long-term follow-up of predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia in the phase 3 COMMODORE trial.Annals of hematology · 2026Trial
- Gilteritinib versus salvage chemotherapy in predominantly Asian patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a regional analysis of COMMODORE in China, South-East Asia, and Russia.Annals of hematology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Current scenario of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a narrative review.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- Discovery of novel and potent CDK8 inhibitors for the treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of second‑generation FLT3 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- The Impact of Gilteritinib on Overall Survival of Adult Patients with FLT3 Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review.Principles and practice of clinical research (2015) · 2024Article
- FLT3-inhibitor therapy for prevention and treatment of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.International journal of hematology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUntil recently, no effective targeted therapies for FLT3-mutated (FLT3
methodsWe evaluated the Japanese subgroup (n = 48) of the ADMIRAL trial, which included 33 patients randomized to 120-mg/day gilteritinib and 15 randomized to SC.
resultsMedian OS was 14.3 months in the gilteritinib arm and 9.6 months in the SC arm. The complete remission/complete remission with partial hematologic recovery rate was higher in the gilteritinib arm (48.5%) than in the SC arm (13.3%). After adjustment for drug exposure, fewer adverse events (AEs) occurred in the gilteritinib arm than in the SC arm. Common grade ≥ 3 AEs related to gilteritinib were febrile neutropenia (36%), decreased platelet count (27%), and anemia (24%).
conclusionFindings in Japanese patients are consistent with those of the overall ADMIRAL study population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.