ArticlePediatric cardiology2022
Percutaneous Common Carotid Artery Access for Cardiac Interventions in Infants Does Not Acutely Change Cerebral Perfusion.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stenting the Ductus Arteriosus in Neonates with Ductal-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow: Technical and Anatomic Considerations.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Systematic approach to obtain axillary arterial access for pediatric heart catheterizations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Patent Ductus Arteriosus Stenting via Percutaneous Common Carotid Artery Access for Ductus Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow in Newborns and Infants: Experience in Latvia.Acta medica Lituanic · 2024Article
- Carotid artery cut-down technique for ductus arteriosus stenting.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2023Article
- Successful bailout stenting for critical aortic coarctation in a premature baby weighing 590 g.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Current-Era Outcomes of Balloon Aortic Valvotomy in Neonates and Infants.JACC. Advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric cardiac interventions via percutaneous common carotid artery (CCA) access have been shown to be safe and effective. However, the impact of placement of a sheath in the carotid artery for interventions on cerebral perfusion is unknown. In this study we used cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to analyze the effects of percutaneous CCA access for cardiac interventions on cerebral perfusion. This study is a retrospective chart review carried out at a tertiary care center on all pediatric patients who underwent percutaneous cardiac catheterization via carotid artery access from January 2010 to January 2020. All patients who had ipsilateral NIRS recorded on the side of carotid artery access were included. Patients with only partial or no ipsilateral NIRS data were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the change in NIRS upon CCA access; the mean NIRS for 15 min before obtaining access was compared to the mean NIRS during the procedure and to the mean NIRS 15 min after removal of the CCA sheath. We hypothesized that there would be a significant drop in NIRS values on the side of CCA access. There were 48 catheterizations in the study period where percutaneous CCA was accessed. Of those, 21 catheterizations had complete data and were included in the study. 13 (62%) were of males. The median age was 23 days (IQR 7-79). The indications for CCA access were patent ductus arteriosus stent implantation (n = 13; 62%), aortic valvuloplasty (n = 5; 24%), balloon angioplasty of coarctation of aorta (n = 2; 10%), and renal artery angioplasty (n = 1; 4%). In 16 patients (72%), the left common carotid artery was accessed. The median weight of the patients was 3.3 kg (IQR 2.8-2.9). The most common sheath size used was 4F, in 16 patients (72%). The mean NIRS prior to the procedure was 67 ± 15%, during the procedure was 68 ± 20%, and after removal of sheath was 68 ± 21%. Paired t test of cerebral NIRS before, during, and after the procedure showed no significant change with CCA access (P = 0.08). No patient in the series had a documented neurologic deficit following the procedure. Percutaneous CCA access was not associated with a decrease in NIRS on the side of the access during the procedure, suggesting there was no significant acute change in cerebral perfusion with CCA access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.