ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
Environmental impacts of income inequality: evidence from G7 economies.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study probes the environmental consequences of income inequality (INQ) in G7 economies from 1971 to 2015. INQ is captured by four indicators comprising GINI coefficients, Palma ratio, Theil index, and Atkinson index on per capita carbon emission as a proxy for environmental degradation using both fully modified OLS (FM-OLS) and dynamic OLS (D-OLS). The empirical data are subjected to pre-test using cross-sectional dependence (CSD) test and panel unit root and panel cointegration tests. The following results are established. First, the absence of CSD and presence of cointegration is confirmed. Second, positive effects of INQ indices are reported for the panel analyses. Third, the results of country-specific analyses are divergent and mixed among the G7 economies. For instance, positive impacts are reported for Canada, Japan, and the USA and negative for France and Germany; and insignificant impacts are evident in the case of Italy and the UK. Fourth, the effects of other covariates emerge from two directions entailing both positive and negative. While per capita GDP (LGDPPC) and trade openness (OPN) are aligned with the former a prior, per energy use (PEU) and inflation (INF) satisfied the latter. Consequently, embarking on pro-poor programs such as social welfare funds, private initiative support fund, and state intervention aimed at checkmating the excesses of the capitalists is seen as sacrosanct to solving the INQ-pco2 nexus disharmony.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34363162What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.