ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Value of layer-specific speckle tracking echocardiography for early detection of myocardial injury caused by chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with cardiovascular risk.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of left ventricular systolic function and pathological changes using layer-specific strain in rats with myocardial hypertrophy at various disease stages.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Ultrasound speckle tracking imaging measurement of endocardial longitudinal strain for evaluation of prognostic value of "new quadruple" therapy in patients with chronic heart failure.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Two-dimensional Speckle Tracking Imaging in Cardiotoxicity Caused by Treatment of Breast Carcinoma with Anthracyclines.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The probability of toxicity-related myocardial injury event with anthracyclines is controversial, which could be related to the underlying cardiac status before chemotherapy. Our study sought to investigate the influence of cardiovascular risk factors on myocardial motion and cardiac function using layer-specific speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) during chemotherapy with epirubicin. Female patients with first-diagnosed breast cancer were prospectively enrolled in our study and received 4 chemotherapeutic cycles with epirubicin in each cycle of 21 days. All patients underwent echocardiography for layer-specific STE analysis before and after all chemotherapy. Clinical data including cardiovascular risk factors were collected. According to the Framingham score, patients with cardiovascular risk factors were divided into groups with low, medium, and high risk. 134 patients existed in the final analysis. The accumulated dose of epirubicin for were 560.0 ± 103.8 mg. 97 (72.4%) patients had cardiovascular risk factors. According to the Framingham score, 57 (42.5%) patients categorized in high risk. Endocardial layer strain after chemotherapy were lower than those at baseline (p < 0.05, all), especially for patients with high risk. The changes of endocardial longitudinal strain during chemotherapy were associated with cardiovascular risks at baseline with correlation coefficient of 0.627. Our study found that layer-specific STE is valuable for early detection of toxicity-related myocardial injury for patients with breast cancer after epirubicin chemotherapy and cardiovascular risk factors have greatly influenced on cardiac function during chemotherapy. The endocardial layer strain is sensitive to evaluate early-stage toxicity-related myocardial injury after epirubicin chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.