Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34363065›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022

The relative fitness of the de novo variants in general Lithuanian population vs. in individuals with intellectual disability.

Laura Pranckėnienė, Vaidutis Kučinskas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura PranckėnienėInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania. Laura.Pranckeniene@mf.vu.lt.ORCID 0000-0002-7442-0732
Vaidutis KučinskasInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Vilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of a variant on an organism is always multifaceted and can be considered from multiple perspectives-biochemical, medical, or evolutionary. However, the relationship between the effects of amino acid substitution on protein activity, human health, and an individual's evolutionary fitness is not trivial. We uncover that the general Lithuanian population is characterized by a "mirror reflection" of the de novo variant fitness effect, confirming the theory of neutrality. Meanwhile, in the group of individuals with intellectual disability, compared with the reference exome de novo variants significantly changed the composition of the amino acid. Therefore, it predicts that, both in terms of the number of amino acids and changes in their relative fitness, the structure of the proteins encoded by the studied amino acids undergo significant changes following the de novo variant, leading to possible changes in protein function associated with phenotypic traits. These results suggest that the analysis of relative fitness of exome sequences with de novo variants can predict the future phenotype. Therefore even in those cases, then only a few of all functional prediction analysis tools predict a variant as damaging, the negative relative fitness or even adaptability of the genome variant should be carefully evaluated considering both its direct function and the global background of the possible disease-associated mechanism regardless of the phenotype being studied.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityAmino AcidsExomeHumansLithuaniaMutationPhenotypeAmino Acids

Identifiers

PMID34363065
PMCPMC8904440
OpenAlexW3190931074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.