Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362997›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Comparison of solid tissue sequencing and liquid biopsy accuracy in identification of clinically relevant gene mutations and rearrangements in lung adenocarcinomas.

Lawrence Hsu Lin, Douglas H R Allison, Yang Feng, George Jour, Kyung Park, Fang Zhou, Andre L Moreira, Guomiao Shen, Xiaojun Feng, Joshua Sabari and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advanced Microfluidics for Single Cell-Based Cancer Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Plasma ctDNA enhances the tissue-based detection of oncodriver mutations in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lawrence Hsu Lin *Departments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Douglas H R Allison *Departments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0701-7740
Yang FengDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
George JourDepartments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Kyung ParkDepartments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Fang ZhouDepartments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Andre L MoreiraDepartments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1857-3774
Guomiao ShenDepartments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Xiaojun FengDepartments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Joshua SabariOncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Vamsidhar VelchetiOncology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Matija SnuderlDepartments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Paolo CotziaDepartments of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Paolo.Cotzia@nyulangone.org.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for therapeutic targets is standard of care in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, most molecular assays utilize tumor tissue, which may not always be available. "Liquid biopsies" are plasma-based next generation sequencing (NGS) assays that use circulating tumor DNA to identify relevant targets. To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of a plasma-based NGS assay to solid-tumor-based NGS we retrospectively analyzed sequencing results of 100 sequential patients with lung adenocarcinoma at our institution who had received concurrent testing with both a solid-tissue-based NGS assay and a commercially available plasma-based NGS assay. Patients represented both new diagnoses (79%) and disease progression on treatment (21%); the majority (83%) had stage IV disease. Tissue-NGS identified 74 clinically relevant mutations, including 52 therapeutic targets, a sensitivity of 94.8%, while plasma-NGS identified 41 clinically relevant mutations, a sensitivity of 52.6% (p < 0.001). Tissue-NGS showed significantly higher sensitivity and accuracy across multiple patient subgroups, both in newly diagnosed and treated patients, as well as in metastatic and nonmetastatic disease. Discrepant cases involved hotspot mutations and actionable fusions including those in EGFR, ALK, and NTRK1. In summary, tissue-NGS detects significantly more clinically relevant alterations and therapeutic targets compared to plasma-NGS, suggesting that tissue-NGS should be the preferred method for molecular testing of lung adenocarcinoma when tissue is available. Plasma-NGS can still play an important role when tissue testing is not possible. However, given its low sensitivity, a negative result should be confirmed with a tissue-based assay.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisGene RearrangementMutationAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyLung NeoplasmsMaleBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID34362997
OpenAlexW3188455963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.