ArticleScientific reports2021
Quantitative susceptibility mapping in ischemic stroke patients after successful recanalization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative MRI Susceptibility: Mapping of Transient Ischemic Attack-A Preliminary Study.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- The Role of Brain Frailty in Stroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Prediction of early neurological deterioration using quantitative susceptibility mapping in small artery occlusion ischemic stroke.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Optimized Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping at 7T MRI for Assessing Iron Deposition in Alzheimer's Disease.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Voxel-Wise Whole-Brain Analysis in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: A Narrative Review.Human brain mapping · 2026Review
- Validation of deep-learning accelerated quantitative susceptibility mapping for deep brain nuclei.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Iron changes within infarct tissue in ischemic stroke patients after successful reperfusion quantified using QSM.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Combining Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping With the Gray Matter Volume to Predict Neurological Deficits in Patients With Small Artery Occlusion.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluating iron deposition in gray matter nuclei of patients with acute ischemic stroke using quantitative susceptibility mapping.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Quantitative Evaluation of Oxygen Extraction Fraction Changes in the Monkey Brain during Acute Stroke by Using Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Measurement of Cerebral Oxygen Extraction Fraction Using Quantitative BOLD Approach: A Review.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a novel processing method for gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Higher magnetic susceptibility in cortical veins have been observed on susceptibility maps in the ischemic hemisphere of stroke patients, indicating an increased oxygen extraction fraction (OEF). Our goal was to investigate susceptibility in veins of stroke patients after successful recanalization in order to analyze the value of QSM in predicting tissue prognosis and clinical outcome. We analyzed MR images of 23 patients with stroke due to unilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA)-M1/M2 occlusion acquired 24-72 h after successful thrombectomy. The susceptibilities of veins were obtained from QSM and compared between the stroke territory, the ipsilateral non-ischemic MCA territory and the contralateral MCA territory. As outcome variables, early infarct size and functional disability (modified Rankin Scale, mRS) after 3-5 months was used. The median susceptibility value of cortical veins in the ischemic core was 41% lower compared to the ipsilateral non-ischemic MCA territory and 38% lower than on the contralateral MCA territory. Strikingly, in none of the patients prominent vessels with high susceptibility signal were found after recanalization. Venous susceptibility values within the infarct did not correlate with infarct volume or functional disability after 3-5 months. Low venous susceptibility within the infarct core after successful recanalization of the occluded vessel likely indicates poor oxygen extraction arising from tissue damage. We did not identify peri-infarct tissue with increased susceptibility values as potential surrogate of former penumbral areas. We found no correlation of QSM parameters with infarct size or outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.