Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362949›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Automatic airway segmentation from computed tomography using robust and efficient 3-D convolutional neural networks.

Antonio Garcia-Uceda, Raghavendra Selvan, Zaigham Saghir, Harm A W M Tiddens, Marleen de Bruijne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. AlveolEye: rapid and precise lung morphometry guided by computer vision.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Skeleton-guided 3D convolutional neural network for tubular structure segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Detail-sensitive 3D-UNet for pulmonary airway segmentation from CT images.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio Garcia-UcedaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.garciauceda@erasmusmc.nl.
Raghavendra SelvanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zaigham SaghirDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary Medicine, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2900, Hellerup, Denmark.
Harm A W M TiddensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marleen de BruijneDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. marleen.debruijne@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLGentofte Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a fully automatic and end-to-end optimised airway segmentation method for thoracic computed tomography, based on the U-Net architecture. We use a simple and low-memory 3D U-Net as backbone, which allows the method to process large 3D image patches, often comprising full lungs, in a single pass through the network. This makes the method simple, robust and efficient. We validated the proposed method on three datasets with very different characteristics and various airway abnormalities: (1) a dataset of pediatric patients including subjects with cystic fibrosis, (2) a subset of the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial, including subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and (3) the EXACT'09 public dataset. We compared our method with other state-of-the-art airway segmentation methods, including relevant learning-based methods in the literature evaluated on the EXACT'09 data. We show that our method can extract highly complete airway trees with few false positive errors, on scans from both healthy and diseased subjects, and also that the method generalizes well across different datasets. On the EXACT'09 test set, our method achieved the second highest sensitivity score among all methods that reported good specificity.

Identifiers

PMID34362949
PMCPMC8346579
OpenAlexW3190742591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.