ArticleScientific reports2021
The inherent community structure of hyperbolic networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Correlates of Extraversion and Trait Creativity: A Graph Theory-Based Whole-Brain Functional Network Modularity Analysis.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Community detection in hypergraphs through hyperedge percolation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Scaling theory of fractal complex networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Emergence of metastability in frustrated oscillatory networks: the key role of hierarchical modularity.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024Article
- Greedy routing optimisation in hyperbolic networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- How the latent geometry of a biological network provides information on its dynamics: the case of the gene network of chronic myeloid leukaemia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Generalised popularity-similarity optimisation model for growing hyperbolic networks beyond two dimensions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A remarkable approach for grasping the relevant statistical features of real networks with the help of random graphs is offered by hyperbolic models, centred around the idea of placing nodes in a low-dimensional hyperbolic space, and connecting node pairs with a probability depending on the hyperbolic distance. It is widely appreciated that these models can generate random graphs that are small-world, highly clustered and scale-free at the same time; thus, reproducing the most fundamental common features of real networks. In the present work, we focus on a less well-known property of the popularity-similarity optimisation model and the [Formula: see text] model from this model family, namely that the networks generated by these approaches also contain communities for a wide range of the parameters, which was certainly not an intention at the design of the models. We extracted the communities from the studied networks using well-established community finding methods such as Louvain, Infomap and label propagation. The observed high modularity values indicate that the community structure can become very pronounced under certain conditions. In addition, the modules found by the different algorithms show good consistency, implying that these are indeed relevant and apparent structural units. Since the appearance of communities is rather common in networks representing real systems as well, this feature of hyperbolic models makes them even more suitable for describing real networks than thought before.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.