ArticleScientific reports2021
Interpretable deep recommender system model for prediction of kinase inhibitor efficacy across cancer cell lines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning for predicting patient drug response by transferring gene-level and cell-level knowledge to tumors.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Exploring graph-based models for predicting active compounds against triple-negative breast cancer.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- A Knowledge-Guided Graph Learning Approach Bridging Phenotype- and Target-Based Drug Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Optimal fusion of genotype and drug embeddings in predicting cancer drug response.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- DGDRP: drug-specific gene selection for drug response prediction via re-ranking through propagating and learning biological network.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer: Predominant and emerging trends.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- PharmacoDB 2.0: improving scalability and transparency of in vitro pharmacogenomics analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Opportunities and challenges in interpretable deep learning for drug sensitivity prediction of cancer cells.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational models for drug sensitivity prediction have the potential to significantly improve personalized cancer medicine. Drug sensitivity assays, combined with profiling of cancer cell lines and drugs become increasingly available for training such models. Multiple methods were proposed for predicting drug sensitivity from cancer cell line features, some in a multi-task fashion. So far, no such model leveraged drug inhibition profiles. Importantly, multi-task models require a tailored approach to model interpretability. In this work, we develop DEERS, a neural network recommender system for kinase inhibitor sensitivity prediction. The model utilizes molecular features of the cancer cell lines and kinase inhibition profiles of the drugs. DEERS incorporates two autoencoders to project cell line and drug features into 10-dimensional hidden representations and a feed-forward neural network to combine them into response prediction. We propose a novel interpretability approach, which in addition to the set of modeled features considers also the genes and processes outside of this set. Our approach outperforms simpler matrix factorization models, achieving R [Formula: see text] 0.82 correlation between true and predicted response for the unseen cell lines. The interpretability analysis identifies 67 biological processes that drive the cell line sensitivity to particular compounds. Detailed case studies are shown for PHA-793887, XMD14-99 and Dabrafenib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.