Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362799›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Linkage to primary-care public health facilities for cardiovascular disease prevention: a community-based cohort study from urban slums in India.

Abhijit Pakhare, Ankur Joshi, Rasha Anwar, Khushbu Dubey, Sanjeev Kumar, Shubham Atal, Ishan Raj Tiwari, Vipul Mayank, Neelesh Shrivastava, Rajnish Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abhijit PakhareDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-4141
Ankur JoshiDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3766-376X
Rasha AnwarNCD Urban Project, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Khushbu DubeyNCD Urban Project, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Sanjeev KumarDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2730-2378
Shubham AtalDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Ishan Raj TiwariAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Vipul MayankAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Neelesh ShrivastavaNCD Urban Project, Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Rajnish JoshiDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India rajnish.genmed@aiimsbhopal.edu.in.ORCID 0000-0002-4702-0522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHypertension and diabetes mellitus are important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Once identified with these conditions, individuals need to be linked to primary healthcare system for initiation of lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy and maintenance of therapies to achieve optimal blood pressure and glycaemic control. In the current study, we evaluated predictors and barriers for non-linkage to primary-care public health facilities for CVD risk reduction.

methodsWe conducted a community-based longitudinal study in 16 urban slum clusters in central India. Community health workers (CHWs) in each urban slum cluster screened all adults, aged 30 years or more for hypertension and diabetes, and those positively screened were sought to be linked to urban primary health centres (UPHCs). We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to identify independent predictors for non-linkage to primary-care providers. We conducted in-depth assessment in 10% of all positively screened, to identify key barriers that potentially prevented linkages to primary-care facilities.

resultsOf 6174 individuals screened, 1451 (23.5%; 95% CI 22.5 to 24.6) were identified as high risk and required linkage to primary-care facilities. Out of these, 544 (37.5%) were linked to public primary-care facilities and 259 (17.8%) to private providers. Of the remaining, 506 (34.9%) did not get linked to any provider and 142 (9.8%) defaulted after initial linkages (treatment interrupters). On multivariate analysis, as compared with those linked to public primary-care facilities, those who were not linked had age less than 45 years (OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.3 to 3.5)), were in lowest wealth quintile (OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.9), resided beyond a kilometre from UPHC (OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.4) and were engaged late by CHWs (OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.7)). Despite having comparable knowledge level, denial about their risk status and lack of family support were key barriers in this group.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates feasibility of CHW-based strategy in promoting linkages to primary-care facilities.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPoverty AreasAdultCohort StudiesCommunity Health WorkersHealth FacilitiesHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPrimary Health Carecardiac epidemiologyepidemiologyhypertensionprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34362799
PMCPMC8351514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.