ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2021
Compression of the vascular wall to create a friction fit in a vascular anastomotic coupler.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing Initial Cervical Spine and Neurovascular Findings in 84 Consecutive Patients with Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel Vascular Anastomotic Coupling Device for End-to-End Anastomosis of Arteries and Veins.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A previously reported microvascular coupler was shown to effectively create vascular anastomoses, but was too large for practical clinical use. To safely reduce coupler size, certain failure modes needed to be better understood. The coupler functions, in part, by compressing the vessel wall between two concentric rings, creating a friction fit that anchors the device to the vessel. This work investigates the relationship between vessel wall compression and resulting friction fit strength to ensure reducing coupler size will not unduly increase the risk that this friction fit might fail. Vascular walls were compressed to a specified strain and the tensile force required to overcome the resulting friction was measured. Experiments were conducted with various vessel types (Porcine common carotid artery, splenic artery, and jugular vein), across a range of compressive strains (55-95%), and by using either PEEK or HDPE to compress the vessel. Tensile force was increased at a rate of 5 g/min or held constant for 24 h. For experiments with incrementally increasing force, the force at failure varied with compressive strain via a power function. At 70% compression, PEEK produced 4.6 times stronger friction fits than HDPE, and common carotid arteries and splenic arteries produced 1.8 and 1.3 times stronger fits than jugular veins respectively. For experiments where tensile force was applied for 24 h, much lower forces were required to overcome friction. These results were compared to friction fit failure in a coupler prototype and it was found that the prototypes failed at just 30% of the force required to cause vessel slip under the other test conditions. These results were used to develop a model that predicts the probability of device failure via vessel slipping (one design, smaller than previously reported, was estimated to fail at maximum in vivo axial stress once in 500 anastomoses, a potentially safe level of risk).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.