ReviewNeurological research and practice2021
Multiple sclerosis therapy consensus group (MSTCG): answers to the discussion questions.
Review in Neurological research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inpatient care for people with multiple sclerosis - a secondary data analysis in Germany between 2019 and 2024.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- The use of cladribine tablets in patients with MS beyond the age of 50: experiences from a large tertiary German centre.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Identification and management of subclinical disease activity in early multiple sclerosis: a review.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Managing multiple sclerosis in individuals aged 55 and above: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Side effects following vaccination in multiple sclerosis: a prospective, multi-centre cohort study.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- No consensus about consensus?Neurological research and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.