Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362435›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Patient outcomes after electrical injury - a retrospective study.

Jamal Ahmed, Charlotte Stenkula, Sherwan Omar, Josef Ghanima, Fredrik Førsund Bremtun, Jonas Bergan, Nezar Raouf, Waleed Ghanima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Voltage Level on Hospitalization and Mortality in Electrical Injury Cases: A Retrospective Analysis from a Turkish Emergency Department.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Outcomes of electrical injuries in the emergency department: epidemiology, severity predictors, and chronic sequelae.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jamal AhmedDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Gralum, Norway. jamahm@so-hf.no.
Charlotte StenkulaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Gralum, Norway.
Sherwan OmarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Gralum, Norway.
Josef GhanimaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Gralum, Norway.
Fredrik Førsund BremtunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Gralum, Norway.
Jonas BerganDepartment of Research Østfold Hospital Trust, Gralum, Norway.
Nezar RaoufDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Gralum, Norway.
Waleed GhanimaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Gralum, Norway.

Funding

NONE NONE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople exposed to electrical injuries are often admitted to hospital for observation. Current evidence suggests that patients who have a normal ECG on admission after a low-voltage injury, with no loss of consciousness or initial cardiac arrest may be discharged home after a short observation time. Currently, there are no established standards for the duration of monitoring after electric shock, but 24 h of observation is the most commonly adopted approach. We carried out a retrospective study of patients admitted after electrical injuries to determine the in-hospital outcomes and 30-day mortality in these patients.

methodsWe performed a chart review of all patients with electrical injuries admitted to Østfold Hospital, Norway between the years 2001 and 2019, to determine in-hospital and 30-day mortality and the frequency of various cardiac and non-cardiac complications.

resultsMean age of 465 included patients (88% males) was 31 years. Of all injuries, 329 (71%) were work-related, 17 (3.7%) involved loss of consciousness. Furthermore, 29/437 (6.6%) were high voltage (> 1000 V), and 243/401 (60.6%) were transthoracic injuries. 369 (79.4%) were discharged same day. None of the admitted patients died in hospital nor did any die within 30 days of admission, yielding a 30-day mortality of 0% (95% CI 0-0.8). At admission troponin was elevated in three (0.6%) patients, creatinine kinase (CK) in 30 (6.5%) and creatinine in six (1.3%). Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities were described in 85 (18%) patients. No serious arrhythmias were detected. When comparing high- vs low-voltage or transthoracic vs other injuries, there were no significant differences between most of the outcomes, except for more ECG abnormalities in the transthoracic group, whereas more patients had elevated CK, and fewer discharged the same day in high-voltage injuries.

conclusionNo in-hospital nor 30-day mortality or serious arrhythmias were encountered in those who were assessed, regardless of the type of injury. Troponin and creatinine were rarely elevated. It seems that conscious patients admitted with a normal ECG following a low-voltage injury may safely be discharged home after a quick clinical assessment including ECG.

Indexed as

Electric InjuriesArrhythmias, CardiacFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTroponinTroponinArrhythmiaElectrical injuryHigh voltage

Identifiers

PMID34362435
PMCPMC8344194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.