Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362419›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2021

Understanding p53 tumour suppressor network.

Emanuele Panatta, Carlotta Zampieri, Gerry Melino, Ivano Amelio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. PAX Family, Master Regulator in Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Three-Dimensional Gene Regulation Network in Glioblastoma Ferroptosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The crisscross between p53 and metabolism in cancer.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Emanuele PanattaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Carlotta ZampieriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Gerry MelinoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9428-5972
Ivano AmelioDepartment of Experimental Medicine, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy. ivano.amelio@uniroma2.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9126-5391
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mutation of TP53 gene affects half of all human cancers, resulting in impairment of the regulation of several cellular functions, including cell cycle progression and cell death in response to genotoxic stress. In the recent years additional p53-mediated tumour suppression mechanisms have been described, questioning the contribution of its canonical pathway for tumour suppression. These include regulation of alternative cell death modalities (i.e. ferroptosis), cell metabolism and the emerging role in RNA stability. Here we briefly summarize our knowledge on p53 "canonical DNA damage response" and discuss the most relevant recent findings describing potential mechanistic explanation of p53-mediated tumour suppression.

Indexed as

Genes, Tumor SuppressorCell DivisionDNA DamageGenes, p53HumansMutationNeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Cell deathDNA damageStress responseTumour suppression

Identifiers

PMID34362419
PMCPMC8348811
OpenAlexW3187599313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.