Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362406›Full record

ReviewJournal of ovarian research2021

Genetic determination of the ovarian reserve: a literature review.

Aleksandra V Moiseeva, Varvara A Kudryavtseva, Vladimir N Nikolenko, Marine M Gevorgyan, Ara L Unanyan, Anastassia A Bakhmet, Mikhail Y Sinelnikov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ovarian research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genes · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aleksandra V MoiseevaSechenov University, Mohovaya 11c10, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Varvara A KudryavtsevaSechenov University, Mohovaya 11c10, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Vladimir N NikolenkoSechenov University, Mohovaya 11c10, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Marine M GevorgyanSaratov State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Ara L UnanyanSechenov University, Mohovaya 11c10, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Anastassia A BakhmetSechenov University, Mohovaya 11c10, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Mikhail Y SinelnikovSechenov University, Mohovaya 11c10, Moscow, Russian Federation. Mikhail.y.sinelnikov@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ovarian reserve is one of the most important indicators of female fertility. It allows for the evaluation of the number of viable oocytes. This parameter is actively used in pregnancy planning and in assisted reproductive technology application, as it determines chances of successful fertilization and healthy pregnancy. Due to increased attention towards diagnostic tests evaluating the ovarian reserve, there has been a growing interest in factors that influence the state of the ovarian reserve. True reasons for pathological changes in the ovarian reserve and volume have not yet been explored in depth, and current diagnostic screening methods often fall short in efficacy. In the following review we analyze existing data relating to the study of the ovarian reserve through genetic testing, determining specific characteristics of the ovarian reserve through genetic profiling. We explore existing studies dedicated to finding specific genetic targets influencing the state of the ovarian reserve.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansOvarian Reserve

Identifiers

PMID34362406
PMCPMC8349022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.