Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362321›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Operationalising the "One Health" approach in India: facilitators of and barriers to effective cross-sector convergence for zoonoses prevention and control.

F A Asaaga, J C Young, M A Oommen, R Chandarana, J August, J Joshi, M M Chanda, A T Vanak, P N Srinivas, S L Hoti and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A framework for facilitating sustainable One Health collaboration across sectors at the national level in the European Union/European Economic Area.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Operationalization of One Health Approach in India: Still Miles to Go?Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

F A AsaagaUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK. fesasa@ceh.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2675-9464
J C YoungUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Edinburgh, EH26 0QB, UK.
M A OommenAshoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru, 560 054, India.
R ChandaranaAshoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru, 560 054, India.
J AugustOxford Brookes University, Headington Campus, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK.
J JoshiCentre for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, B-25, Lajpat Nagar-2, New Delhi, India.
M M ChandaICAR-National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Ramagondanahalli, Yelahanka New Town, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560064, India.
A T VanakAshoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bengaluru, 560 054, India.
P N SrinivasInstitute of Public Health, Banashankari 2nd Stage, Bangalore, 560 070, India.
S L HotiICMR-National Institute for Traditional Medicine, Belgavi, Karnataka, 590010, India.
T SeshadriAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRAE, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000, Dijon, France.
B V PurseUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK.
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment · INInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology · GBCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy · INICMR-National Institute of Virology · INInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru · INNational Institute Of Veterinary Epidemiology And Disease Informatics · INOxford Brookes University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/P024335/1Medical Research Council MR/P024335/2Medical Research Council MR/S012893/1Medical Research Council MR/S012893/2Medical Research Council MR/T029846/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a strong policy impetus for the One Health cross-sectoral approach to address the complex challenge of zoonotic diseases, particularly in low/lower middle income countries (LMICs). Yet the implementation of this approach in LMIC contexts such as India has proven challenging, due partly to the relatively limited practical guidance and understanding on how to foster and sustain cross-sector collaborations. This study addresses this gap by exploring the facilitators of and barriers to successful convergence between the human, animal and environmental health sectors in India.

methodsA mixed methods study was conducted using a detailed content review of national policy documents and in-depth semi-structured interview data on zoonotic disease management in India. In total, 29 policy documents were reviewed and 15 key informant interviews were undertaken with national and state level policymakers, disease managers and experts operating within the human-animal-environment interface of zoonotic disease control.

resultsOur findings suggest that there is limited policy visibility of zoonotic diseases, although global zoonoses, especially those identified to be of pandemic potential by international organisations (e.g. CDC, WHO and OIE) rather than local, high burden endemic diseases, have high recognition in the existing policy agenda setting. Despite the widespread acknowledgement of the importance of cross-sectoral collaboration, a myriad of factors operated to either constrain or facilitate the success of cross-sectoral convergence at different stages (i.e. information-sharing, undertaking common activities and merging resources and infrastructure) of cross-sectoral action. Importantly, participants identified the lack of supportive policies, conflicting departmental priorities and limited institutional capacities as major barriers that hamper effective cross-sectoral collaboration on zoonotic disease control. Building on existing informal inter-personal relationships and collaboration platforms were suggested by participants as the way forward.

conclusionOur findings point to the importance of strengthening existing national policy frameworks as a first step for leveraging cross-sectoral capacity for improved disease surveillance and interventions. This requires the contextual adaptation of the One Health approach in a manner that is sensitive to the underlying socio-political, institutional and cultural context that determines and shapes outcomes of cross-sector collaborative arrangements.

Indexed as

One HealthAnimalsHumansIndiaZoonosesCross-sectoral convergenceEmerging infectious diseaseHealth systemIndiaOne healthZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34362321
PMCPMC8342985
OpenAlexW3191551094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.