ArticleBMC genomics2021
Comparative analyses of two primate species diverged by more than 60 million years show different rates but similar distribution of genome-wide UV repair events.
Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromatin context shapes DNA damage formation and nucleotide excision repair dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Joint modeling of human cortical structure: Genetic correlation network and composite-trait genetic correlation.NeuroImage · 2024Article
- UV damage induces production of mitochondrial DNA fragments with specific length profiles.Genetics · 2024Article
- Genome-wide analysis of transcription-coupled repair reveals novel transcription events in Caenorhabditis elegans.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Genome-wide analysis of transcription-coupled repair reveals novel transcription events inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Cross-species investigation into the requirement of XPA for nucleotide excision repair.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- UV damage induces production of mitochondrial DNA fragments with specific length profiles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Nucleotide excision repair: a versatile and smart toolkit.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022Review
- A new technique for genome-wide mapping of nucleotide excision repair without immunopurification of damaged DNA.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Article
- Super hotspots and super coldspots in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage in the human genome.The Journal of biological chemistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNucleotide excision repair is the primary DNA repair mechanism that removes bulky DNA adducts such as UV-induced pyrimidine dimers. Correspondingly, genome-wide mapping of nucleotide excision repair with eXcision Repair sequencing (XR-seq), provides comprehensive profiling of DNA damage repair. A number of XR-seq experiments at a variety of conditions for different damage types revealed heterogenous repair in the human genome. Although human repair profiles were extensively studied, how repair maps vary between primates is yet to be investigated. Here, we characterized the genome-wide UV-induced damage repair in gray mouse lemur, Microcebus murinus, in comparison to human.
resultsWe derived fibroblast cell lines from mouse lemur, exposed them to UV irradiation, and analyzed the repair events genome-wide using the XR-seq protocol. Mouse lemur repair profiles were analyzed in comparison to the equivalent human fibroblast datasets. We found that overall UV sensitivity, repair efficiency, and transcription-coupled repair levels differ between the two primates. Despite this, comparative analysis of human and mouse lemur fibroblasts revealed that genome-wide repair profiles of the homologous regions are highly correlated, and this correlation is stronger for highly expressed genes. With the inclusion of an additional XR-seq sample derived from another human cell line in the analysis, we found that fibroblasts of the two primates repair UV-induced DNA lesions in a more similar pattern than two distinct human cell lines do.
conclusionOur results suggest that mouse lemurs and humans, and possibly primates in general, share a homologous repair mechanism as well as genomic variance distribution, albeit with their variable repair efficiency. This result also emphasizes the deep homologies of individual tissue types across the eukaryotic phylogeny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.