Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362232›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Reliability of Pelvic Floor Muscle Assessment with Transabdominal Ultrasound in Young Nulliparous Women.

Bartosz Zając, Iwona Sulowska-Daszyk, Anna Mika, Artur Stolarczyk, Ewelina Rosłoniec, Aleksandra Królikowska, Marian Rzepko, Łukasz Oleksy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bartosz ZającLaboratory of Functional Diagnostics, Central Scientific and Research Laboratory, University of Physical Education in Kraków, 31-571 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3331-7795
Iwona Sulowska-DaszykInstitute of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Kraków, 31-571 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1025-0508
Anna MikaInstitute of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Kraków, 31-571 Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4366-5091
Artur StolarczykOrthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.
Ewelina RosłoniecInstitute of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Kraków, 31-571 Kraków, Poland.
Aleksandra KrólikowskaDepartment of Sports Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-5500
Marian RzepkoInstitute of Physical Culture Sciences, Rzeszów University, 35-310 Rzeszów, Poland.
Łukasz OleksyOrthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warszawa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0589-0554
University School of Physical Education in Kraków · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLUniversity of Rzeszów · PLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of pelvic floor muscles evaluation via transabdominal ultrasonography in young nulliparous women and to present the methodology for quantitative assessment of the ultrasound image of the pelvic floor muscles visible as displacement of the posterior wall of the bladder, caused by action of the pelvic floor muscles. The study comprised 30 young, Caucasian, nulliparous women (age 22-27; 168.6 ± 5.1 cm; 57.1 ± 11.8 kg) without pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions. The intra-rater, test-retest and inter-rater reliability of pelvic floor muscles evaluation was performed using transabdominal ultrasound at rest and during voluntary contraction. The reliability was assessed at three points of the image (at the middle, on the right and left side). The reliability of the three-point measurement of the pelvic floor muscles transabdominal ultrasound is excellent in the case of intra-rater assessments, both at rest (ICC = 0.98-0.99) and during contraction (ICC = 0.97-0.98); moderate at rest (ICC = 0.54-0.62) and poor during contraction (ICC = 0.22-0.50) in the case of test-retest assessment; excellent at rest (ICC = 0.95-0.96), and good during contraction (ICC = 0.81-0.87) in the case of inter-rater assessment. Transabdominal ultrasound is a reliable method of pelvic floor muscle evaluation. The three-points of assessment used in our study allowed for broader and more comprehensive imaging of the pelvic floor muscle, e.g., for quantitative detection contractility imbalances between the left and right side Due to the fact that understanding mechanisms of pelvic floor muscle functioning is crucial in the therapy of pelvic floor dysfunctions, therefore, reliable, valid tests and instruments are important.

Indexed as

pelvic floor dysfunctionspelvic floor musclesreliabilitytransabdominal ultrasonographic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID34362232
PMCPMC8348606
OpenAlexW3188188915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.