Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362193›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Current and Prospective Treatment of Adenomyosis.

Fady I Sharara, Mira H Kheil, Anis Feki, Sara Rahman, Jordan S Klebanoff, Jean Marc Ayoubi, Gaby N Moawad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Modern view on the diagnostics and treatment of adenomyosis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fady I ShararaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Mira H KheilFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 11-0236, Lebanon.
Anis FekiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital Fribourg, 1702 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9817-9445
Sara RahmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Jordan S KlebanoffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, PN 19096, USA.
Jean Marc AyoubiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hopital Foch, 92150 Suresnes, France.
Gaby N MoawadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC 20037, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3240-1496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Adenomyosis is a poorly understood entity which makes it difficult to standardize treatment. In this paper we review and compare the currently approved medical and surgical treatments of adenomyosis and present the evidence behind them. (2) Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify papers related to the different treatments of adenomyosis. The search was limited to the English language. Articles were divided into medical and surgical treatments. (3) Results: Several treatment options have been studied and were found to be effective in the treatment of adenomyosis. (4) Conclusions: Further randomized controlled trials are needed to compare treatment modalities and establish a uniform treatment algorithm for adenomyosis.

Indexed as

adenomyosisfertilitymedical treatmentsurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID34362193
PMCPMC8348135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.