Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362166›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Phillip C Nguyen, Hannah Stevens, Karlheinz Peter, James D McFadyen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter-Directed Lysis in Treating Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolization: 30-Day Outcome.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contemporary management of intracardiac thrombi: a tale of two clots.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Phillip C NguyenDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3181, Australia.
Hannah StevensDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3181, Australia.
Karlheinz PeterAtherothrombosis and Vascular Biology, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
James D McFadyenDepartment of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3181, Australia.
The Alfred Hospital · AUBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) lies on a spectrum of disease severity between standard and high-risk disease. By definition, patients with submassive PE have a worse outcome than the majority of those with standard-risk PE, who are hemodynamically stable and lack imaging or laboratory features of cardiac dysfunction. Systemic thrombolytic therapy has been proven to reduce mortality in patients with high-risk disease; however, its use in submassive PE has not demonstrated a clear benefit, with haemodynamic improvements being offset by excess bleeding. Furthermore, meta-analyses have been confusing, with conflicting results on overall survival and net gain. As such, significant interest remains in optimising thrombolysis, with recent efforts in catheter-based delivery as well as upcoming studies on reduced systemic dosing. Recently, long-term cardiorespiratory limitations following submassive PE have been described, termed post-PE syndrome. Studies on the ability of thrombolytic therapy to prevent this condition also present conflicting evidence. In this review, we aim to clarify the current evidence with respect to submassive PE management, and also to highlight shortcomings in current definitions and prognostic factors. Additionally, we discuss novel therapies currently in preclinical and early clinical trials that may improve outcomes in patients with submassive PE.

Indexed as

pulmonary embolismsubmassive

Identifiers

PMID34362166
PMCPMC8347177
OpenAlexW3190215023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.