Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362066›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Impact on Visual Acuity in Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) in Europe Due to COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown.

Carolina Arruabarrena, Mario Damiano Toro, Mehmet Onen, Boris E Malyugin, Robert Rejdak, Danielle Tognetto, Sandrine Zweifel, Rosa Giglio, Miguel A Teus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Macular neovascularization lesion type and vision outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: post hoc analysis of HARBOR.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Carolina ArruabarrenaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alcalá de Henares, Universidad de Alcalá, 28802 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5312-8900
Mario Damiano ToroDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-2613
Mehmet OnenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Boris E MalyuginS. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Russian Federation, 127486 Moscow, Russia.
Robert RejdakChair and Department of General and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Medical University of Lublin, 20079 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3321-2723
Danielle TognettoEye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34134 Trieste, Italy.
Sandrine ZweifelDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7431-1774
Rosa GiglioEye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34134 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-0786
Miguel A TeusDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alcalá de Henares, Universidad de Alcalá, 28802 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3835-9882
Medical University of Lublin · PLUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversity of Trieste · ITIntersectoral Research and Technology Complex Eye Microsurgery · RUMemorial Ankara Hospital · TRUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Fundacion de investigacion Biomedica Principe de Asturias November 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a retrospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients with nAMD scheduled for a visit and/or a treatment with an intravitreal injection (IVI) during the 3 months before lockdown in the Ophthalmology Departments of six centers of Europe.The study was conducted on 546 patients, of which 55.13% were females, almost 100% of the patients were White/Caucasian race, and 71.53% of the patients presented a type 1 macular neovascularization (NVM). A total of 62.82% of patients (343 patients) that were on scheduled clinic visits and/or intravitreal injection treatment during the 3 months before the quarantine did not attend either to visit or for treatment during the lockdown. The mean number of injections during the lockdown was significantly reduced. This was followed by a significant reduction in the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between the 3 months before the lockdown (mean BCVA of 60.68 ± 19.77 letters) and 6 months after lockdown (mean BCVA of 56.98 ± 22.59 letters). Patients with better BCVA before the lockdown and the ones showing neovascular activity were more likely to attend their scheduled visits and/or IVI treatments. The COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown have led to a decrease in the number of IVI treatments in patients with nAMD, evidencing a significant vision loss at 6 months.

Indexed as

AMDCOVID-19neovascular age related macular degenerationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34362066
PMCPMC8348378
OpenAlexW3185986919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.