Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362052›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Visual Quality and Visual Function of Two Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Made from the Same Material, but with Different Design and Optics.

Ladislav Viktor Nováček, Marie Němcová, Kateřina Tyx, Kristýna Lahodová, Leoš Rejmont, Pavel Rozsíval, Pavel Studený

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ladislav Viktor NováčekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Aviation Medicine Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Marie NěmcováDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Aviation Medicine Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Kateřina TyxDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Aviation Medicine Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Kristýna LahodováDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Aviation Medicine Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Leoš RejmontDepartment of Ophthalmology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and the Military University Hospital Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2424-3173
Pavel RozsívalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Aviation Medicine Prague, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel StudenýDepartment of Ophthalmology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and the Military University Hospital Prague, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This semi-prospective, parallel, comparative investigation evaluated the clinical outcomes and quality of vision (contrast sensitivity, visual function, dysphotopsia, spectacle use, overall satisfaction) after mono- or bilateral implantation of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOL)-the Liberty

Indexed as

677MY839Mcataractcontrast sensitivitydysphotopsiamultifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL)posterior capsule opacificationpresbyopiavisual functionvisual outcomes

Identifiers

PMID34362052
PMCPMC8347739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.