Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362031›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Prospective Evaluation of Resection Margins Using Standardized Specimen Protocol Analysis among Patients with Distal Cholangiocarcinoma and Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Jonathan Garnier, Jacques Ewald, Flora Poizat, Eddy Traversari, Ugo Marchese, Anais Palen, Jean Robert Delpero, Olivier Turrini

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan GarnierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France.
Jacques EwaldDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France.
Flora PoizatDepartment of Pathology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France.
Eddy TraversariDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France.
Ugo MarcheseDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8647-7584
Anais PalenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France.
Jean Robert DelperoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Aix-Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0000-1332
Olivier TurriniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, CRCM, Aix-Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France.
Institut Paoli-Calmettes · FRAix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUsing a standardized specimen protocol analysis, this study aimed to evaluate the resection margin status of patients who underwent resection for either distal cholangiocarcinoma (DC) or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This allowed a precise millimetric analysis of each inked margin.

methodsFrom 2010 to 2018, 355 consecutively inked specimens from patients with PDAC (

resultsPatients with DC were mostly men (64% vs. 49%,

conclusionOur standardized specimen protocol analysis showed that the R1 resection rate was comparable in PDAC and DC.

Indexed as

distal cholangiocarcinomamarginpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaR1 resection

Identifiers

PMID34362031
PMCPMC8348230
OpenAlexW3187051095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.