Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34362029›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Efficacy of Manual Therapy and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Cervical Mobility and Endurance in Subacute and Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Belén Díaz-Pulido, Yolanda Pérez-Martín, Daniel Pecos-Martín, Isabel Rodríguez-Costa, Milagros Pérez-Muñoz, Victoria Calvo-Fuente, María Félix Ortiz-Jiménez, Ángel Asúnsolo-Del Barco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can Manual Therapy Alter Muscle Stiffness in Patients With Spinal Accessory Nerve Injury?Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Belén Díaz-PulidoPhysiotherapy Department, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9318-4045
Yolanda Pérez-MartínPhysiotherapy Department, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.
Daniel Pecos-MartínPhysiotherapy Department, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8690-0998
Isabel Rodríguez-CostaPhysiotherapy Department, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6645-2187
Milagros Pérez-MuñozPhysiotherapy Department, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.
Victoria Calvo-FuentePhysiotherapy Department, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.
María Félix Ortiz-JiménezPuerta de Madrid Health Center, Public Health System of the Community of Madrid, 28802 Madrid, Spain.
Ángel Asúnsolo-Del BarcoSurgery, Medical and Social Sciences Department, University of Alcalá, 28871 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-4685
Universidad de Alcalá · ESMadrid Health Service · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neck pain is a frequent health problem. Manual therapy (MT) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are recommended techniques for treatment of mechanical neck disorders (MND) in Spanish Public Primary Care Physiotherapy Services. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of MT versus TENS in active mobility and endurance in cervical subacute or chronic neck pain. Ninety patients with MND were randomly allocated to receive ten 30-min sessions of either MT or TENS, in a multi-centered study through 12 Primary Care Physiotherapy Units in the Madrid community. Active cervical range of motion (CD-ROM) and endurance (Palmer and Epler test) were evaluated pre- and post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. A generalized linear model of repeated measures was constructed for the analysis of differences. Post-intervention MT yielded a significant improvement in active mobility and endurance in patients with subacute or chronic MND, and at 6-month follow-up the differences were only significant in endurance and in sagittal plane active mobility. In the TENS group, no significant improvement was detected. With regard to other variables, MT improved mobility and endurance more effectively than TENS at post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up in the sagittal plane. Only MT generated significant improvements in cervical mobility and endurance in the three movement planes.

Indexed as

musculoskeletal manipulationneck painphysical therapy modalitiespublic healthtranscutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS)

Identifiers

PMID34362029
PMCPMC8347502
OpenAlexW3183896681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.