Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34361457›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Fly Ash-Based Eco-Efficient Concretes: A Comprehensive Review of the Short-Term Properties.

Mugahed Amran, Roman Fediuk, Gunasekaran Murali, Siva Avudaiappan, Togay Ozbakkaloglu, Nikolai Vatin, Maria Karelina, Sergey Klyuev, Aliakbar Gholampour

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Technogenic Fiber Wastes for Optimizing Concrete.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Mugahed AmranDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj 16273, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4434-6295
Roman FediukPolytechnic Institute, Far Eastern Federal University, 690922 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-1240
Gunasekaran MuraliSchool of Civil Engineering, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur 61340, India.
Siva AvudaiappanDepartamento de Ingeniería en Obras Civiles, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Av. Ecuador 3659, Chile.
Togay OzbakkalogluIngram School of Engineering, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3015-736X
Nikolai VatinMoscow Automobile and Road Construction University, 125319 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-8004
Maria KarelinaDepartment of Machinery Parts and Theory of Mechanisms, Moscow Automobile and Road Construction University, 125319 Moscow, Russia.
Sergey KlyuevDepartment of Theoretical Mechanics and Strength of Materials, Belgorod State Technological University Named after V.G. Shukhov, 308012 Belgorod, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1995-6139
Aliakbar GholampourCollege of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Tonsley, SA 5042, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5069-2963
Moscow Automobile and Road Construction State Technical University · RUBelgorod State Technological University · RUFar Eastern Federal University · RUFlinders University · AUPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SASASTRA University · INTexas State University · USUniversidad de Santiago de Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of sustainable concrete as an alternative to conventional concrete helps in reducing carbon dioxide footprint associated with the use of cement and disposal of waste materials in landfill. One way to achieve that is the use of fly ash (FA) as an alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC) because FA is a pozzolanic material and has a high amount of alumina and silica content. Because of its excellent mechanical properties, several studies have been conducted to investigate the use of alkali-activated FA-based concrete as an alternative to conventional concrete. FA, as an industrial by-product, occupies land, thereby causing environmental pollution and health problems. FA-based concrete has numerous advantages, such as it has early strength gaining, it uses low natural resources, and it can be configurated into different structural elements. This study initially presents a review of the classifications, sources, chemical composition, curing regimes and clean production of FA. Then, physical, fresh, and mechanical properties of FA-based concretes are studied. This review helps in better understanding of the behavior of FA-based concrete as a sustainable and eco-friendly material used in construction and building industries.

Indexed as

alkali-activated materialfly ashpozzolanicpropertiesshort-term strengthsutilizations

Identifiers

PMID34361457
PMCPMC8347113
OpenAlexW3188173583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.