Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34361444›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparison of the Toxicity of Pristine Graphene and Graphene Oxide, Using Four Biological Models.

Sławomir Jaworski, Barbara Strojny-Cieślak, Mateusz Wierzbicki, Marta Kutwin, Ewa Sawosz, Maciej Kamaszewski, Arkadiusz Matuszewski, Malwina Sosnowska, Jarosław Szczepaniak, Karolina Daniluk and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sławomir JaworskiDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Barbara Strojny-CieślakDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2642-5491
Mateusz WierzbickiDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3623-8929
Marta KutwinDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7059-7875
Ewa SawoszDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0016-4721
Maciej KamaszewskiDepartment of Ichthyology and Biotechnology in Aquaculture, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8329-0741
Arkadiusz MatuszewskiDepartment of Animal Breeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1319-6367
Malwina SosnowskaDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Jarosław SzczepaniakDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5808-9755
Karolina DanilukDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Agata LangeDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-083X
Michał PruchniewskiDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna ZawadzkaDepartment of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej ŁojkowskiFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Wołoska 141, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Andre ChwalibogDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Groennegaardsvej 3, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8150-2392
Warsaw University of Life Sciences · PLUniversity of Copenhagen · DKWarsaw University of Technology · PL

Funding

The National Science Center in Poland 2015/19/D/NZ8/03871The National Science Center in Poland 2016/23/D/NZ9/01401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are numerous applications of graphene in biomedicine and they can be classified into several main areas: delivery systems, sensors, tissue engineering and biological agents. The growing biomedical field of applications of graphene and its derivates raises questions regarding their toxicity. We will demonstrate an analysis of the toxicity of two forms of graphene using four various biological models: zebrafish (

Indexed as

biological modelsgraphenegraphene oxidetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID34361444
PMCPMC8348526
OpenAlexW3183342023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.