Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360994›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

In Vitro Evaluation of Rigosertib Antitumoral and Radiosensitizing Effects against Human Cholangiocarcinoma Cells.

Alessio Malacrida, Roberta Rigolio, Luigi Celio, Silvia Damian, Guido Cavaletti, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Mariarosaria Miloso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Another Brick to Confirm the Efficacy of Rigosertib as Anticancer Agent.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Rigosertib and Cholangiocarcinoma: A Cell Cycle Affair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alessio MalacridaExperimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Roberta RigolioExperimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Luigi CelioMedical Oncology Unit, ASST del Garda, 25015 Desenzano del Garda, Italy.
Silvia DamianMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori-Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9560-1092
Guido CavalettiExperimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-2406
Vincenzo MazzaferroDepartment of Hepatology, Hepato Pancreatic Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Foundation IRCCS, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Mariarosaria MilosoExperimental Neurology Unit, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900 Monza, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITCasa di Cura Villa Garda · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma is the first most common cancer of the biliary tract. To date, surgical resection is the only potentially curative option, but it is possible only for a limited percentage of patients, and in any case survival rate is quite low. Moreover, cholangiocarcinoma is often chemotherapy-resistant, and the only drug with a significant benefit for patient's survival is Gemcitabine. It is necessary to find new drugs or combination therapies to treat nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma and improve the overall survival rate of patients. In this work, we evaluate in vitro the antitumoral effects of Rigosertib, a multi-kinase inhibitor in clinical development, against cholangiocarcinoma EGI-1 cell lines. Rigosertib impairs EGI-1 cell viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner, reversibility is dose-dependent, and significant morphological and nuclear alterations occur. Moreover, Rigosertib induces the arrest of the cell cycle in the G2/M phase, increases autophagy, and inhibits proteasome, cell migration, and invasion. Lastly, Rigosertib shows to be a stronger radiosensitizer than Gemcitabine and 5-Fluorouracil. In conclusion, Rigosertib could be a potential therapeutic option, alone or in combination with radiations, for nonresectable patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAutophagyBile Duct NeoplasmsCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell MovementCholangiocarcinomaDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineGlycineHumansRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsSulfonesAntineoplastic AgentsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineGlycineON 01910Radiation-Sensitizing AgentsSulfonesautophagycell cyclecell migrationchemotherapycholangiocarcinomamitotic catastropheproteasomeradiotherapyRigosertib

Identifiers

PMID34360994
PMCPMC8348961
OpenAlexW3189056132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.