Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360864›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Effect of Different Bone Grafting Materials and Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Bone Regeneration: A Micro-Computed Tomography and Histomorphometric Study in a Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model.

Shiau-Ting Shiu, Wei-Fang Lee, Sheng-Min Chen, Liu-Ting Hao, Yuan-Ting Hung, Pin-Chuang Lai, Sheng-Wei Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Comparing the effects of BoneClinical and experimental dental research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Stem Cells and Bone Tissue Engineering.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Shiau-Ting ShiuSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Wei-Fang LeeSchool of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Sheng-Min ChenSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Liu-Ting HaoSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Yuan-Ting HungSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Pin-Chuang LaiDepartment of Diagnosis and Oral Health, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Sheng-Wei FengSchool of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6637-7044
Taipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the new bone formation potential of micro-macro biphasic calcium phosphate (MBCP) and Bio-Oss grafting materials with and without dental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cells (DPSCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in a rabbit calvarial bone defect model. The surface structure of the grafting materials was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The multipotent differentiation characteristics of the DPSCs and BMSCs were assessed. Four circular bone defects were created in the calvarium of 24 rabbits and randomly allocated to eight experimental groups: empty control, MBCP, MBCP+DPSCs, MBCP+BMSCs, Bio-Oss+DPSCs, Bio-Oss+BMSCs, and autogenous bone. A three-dimensional analysis of the new bone formation was performed using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and a histological study after 2, 4, and 8 weeks of healing. Homogenously porous structures were observed in both grafting materials. The BMSCs revealed higher osteogenic differentiation capacities, whereas the DPSCs exhibited higher colony-forming units. The micro-CT and histological analysis findings for the new bone formation were consistent. In general, the empty control showed the lowest bone regeneration capacity throughout the experimental period. By contrast, the percentage of new bone formation was the highest in the autogenous bone group after 2 (39.4% ± 4.7%) and 4 weeks (49.7% ± 1.5%) of healing (

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBone SubstitutesBone TransplantationCraniofacial AbnormalitiesMaleMineralsOsteogenesisRabbitsTissue EngineeringWound HealingBio-OssBone SubstitutesMineralsBio-Ossbone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cellsbone regenerationdental pulp-derived mesenchymal stem cellsMBCPmesenchymal stem cell

Identifiers

PMID34360864
PMCPMC8347101
OpenAlexW3185271691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.