Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360664›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Chitosan Micro-Grooved Membranes with Increased Asymmetry for the Improvement of the Schwann Cell Response in Nerve Regeneration.

Luca Scaccini, Roberta Mezzena, Alessia De Masi, Mariacristina Gagliardi, Giovanna Gambarotta, Marco Cecchini, Ilaria Tonazzini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Chiral MoSJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Chitosan-Based Antibacterial Films for Biomedical and Food Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Graphene-based nanomaterials for peripheral nerve regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luca ScacciniNational Enterprise for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NEST), Istituto Nanoscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) and Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1844-1579
Roberta MezzenaNational Enterprise for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NEST), Istituto Nanoscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) and Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3886-8230
Alessia De MasiNational Enterprise for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NEST), Istituto Nanoscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) and Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8453-6790
Mariacristina GagliardiNational Enterprise for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NEST), Istituto Nanoscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) and Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5860-3141
Giovanna GambarottaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences (DSCB), University of Torino, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8380-5925
Marco CecchiniNational Enterprise for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NEST), Istituto Nanoscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) and Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-2356
Ilaria TonazziniNational Enterprise for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NEST), Istituto Nanoscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) and Scuola Normale Superiore Pisa, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7323-2174

Funding

Italian Health Ministry (Progetto Ricerca Finalizzata) RF-2018-12366887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries are a common condition in which a nerve is damaged, affecting more than one million people every year. There are still no efficient therapeutic treatments for these injuries. Artificial scaffolds can offer new opportunities for nerve regeneration applications; in this framework, chitosan is emerging as a promising biomaterial. Here, we set up a simple and effective method for the production of micro-structured chitosan films by solvent casting, with high fidelity in the micro-pattern reproducibility. Three types of chitosan directional micro-grooved patterns, presenting different levels of symmetricity, were developed for application in nerve regenerative medicine: gratings (GR), isosceles triangles (ISO) and scalene triangles (SCA). The directional patterns were tested with a Schwann cell line. The most asymmetric topography (SCA), although it polarized the cell shaping less efficiently, promoted higher cell proliferation and a faster cell migration, both individually and collectively, with a higher directional persistence of motion. Overall, the use of micro-structured asymmetrical directional topographies may be exploited to enhance the nerve regeneration process mediated by chitosan scaffolds.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationWound HealingCell MovementCell ProliferationChitosanHumansMembranesNeurilemmomaSchwann CellsChitosancontact guidancenerve regenerationSchwann cells

Identifiers

PMID34360664
PMCPMC8348329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.