Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360512›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Concerns and Support after One Year of COVID-19 in Austria: A Qualitative Study Using Content Analysis with 1505 Participants.

Yvonne Schaffler, Afsaneh Gächter, Rachel Dale, Andrea Jesser, Thomas Probst, Christoph Pieh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06621537 (Mental Health Burden and Help-seeking Behavior in the Austrian General Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06621537 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Mental Health Burden and Help-seeking Behavior in the Austrian General Population: from Problem to Psychotherapy in Different Population Groups from a Psychotherapy Science Perspective

TypeobservationalSponsorSigmund Freud PrivatUniversitatRan2024 to 2024Enrolled2,025ConditionsScreening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. COVID-19: Regional Differences in Austria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yvonne SchafflerDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4068-8930
Afsaneh GächterDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
Rachel DaleDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0526-8834
Andrea JesserDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0872-1131
Thomas ProbstDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-2133
Christoph PiehDepartment for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2708-303X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent governmental restrictions have had a major impact on the daily lives of Austrians and negatively affected their mental health. A representative sample of N = 1505 individuals was recruited via Qualtrics

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdolescentAustriaFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2AustriaconcernsCOVID-19 pandemicdistressproblem areasstress coping

Identifiers

PMID34360512
PMCPMC8346103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.