Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360483›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Results of Pregnancy Control before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Two Cohorts.

Javier Llorca, Carolina Lechosa-Muñiz, Pelayo Frank de Zulueta, Sonia López-Gómez, Victoria Orallo, Jéssica Alonso-Molero, Barbara Arozamena-Llano, Yolanda Jubete, María Paz-Zulueta, María J Cabero and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A systematic review of COVID-19's impact on pregnancy outcomes.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Javier LlorcaFaculty of Medicine, Universidad de Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain.
Carolina Lechosa-MuñizFaculty of Medicine, Universidad de Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain.
Pelayo Frank de ZuluetaService of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
Sonia López-GómezService of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
Victoria OralloService of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
Jéssica Alonso-MoleroFaculty of Medicine, Universidad de Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1939-8798
Barbara Arozamena-LlanoService of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
Yolanda JubeteService of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
María Paz-ZuluetaFaculty of Medicine, Universidad de Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3201-5488
María J CaberoFaculty of Medicine, Universidad de Cantabria, 39011 Santander, Spain.
On Behalf Of The Moacc-Group
Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESUniversidad de Cantabria · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III COV20/00923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic placed pregnant women at high risk, but behavioural changes have also led to lower rates of preterm births in high-income countries. The main goal of this article is to study the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pregnancy control and outcomes; this is a joint analysis of two cohorts. The pre-pandemic cohort includes 969 pregnant women recruited in 2018. The pandemic cohort comprises 1168 pregnant women recruited in 2020. Information on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, reproductive history, characteristics of the current pregnancy and its outcome were obtained from medical records. Birth by Caesarean section was more frequent in the pre-pandemic cohort (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.92). A birth weight lower than 2500 g and higher than 4000 g occurred more frequently in the pre-pandemic cohort (adjusted OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41-0.93 for lower than 2500 g and adjusted OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20-0.46 for higher than 4000 g). Exclusive breastfeeding upon hospital discharge was more frequent in the pandemic cohort than in the pre-pandemic cohort (60% vs. 54%,

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancySARS-CoV-2cohortCOVID-19pregnant

Identifiers

PMID34360483
PMCPMC8345982
OpenAlexW3175871750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.