Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360479›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Virtual Reality-Based Self-Help Intervention for Dealing with the Psychological Distress Associated with the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Effectiveness Study with a Two-Week Follow-Up.

Giuseppe Riva, Luca Bernardelli, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Daniele Di Lernia, Cosimo Tuena, Alex Clementi, Elisa Pedroli, Clelia Malighetti, Francesca Sforza, Brenda K Wiederhold and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giuseppe RivaHumane Technology Lab., Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3657-106X
Luca BernardelliBecome-Hub, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Gianluca CastelnuovoDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2633-9822
Daniele Di LerniaDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6850-6866
Cosimo TuenaApplied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab., IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20149 Milan, Italy.
Alex ClementiDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Elisa PedroliApplied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Lab., IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20149 Milan, Italy.
Clelia MalighettiDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Francesca SforzaBecome-Hub, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Brenda K WiederholdVirtual Reality Medical Center, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3320-0303
Silvia SerinoDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8422-1358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a novel self-administered at-home daily virtual reality (VR)-based intervention (COVID Feel Good) for reducing the psychological burden experienced during the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. A total of 40 individuals who had experienced at least two months of strict social distancing measures followed COVID Feel Good between June and July 2020 for one week. Primary outcome measures were depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms, perceived stress levels, and hopelessness. Secondary outcomes were the experienced social connectedness and the level of fear experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Additionally, we also performed a clinical change analysis on primary outcome measures. As concerning primary outcome measures, participants exhibited improvements from baseline to post-intervention for depression levels, stress levels, general distress, and perceived stress (all

Indexed as

COVID-19Psychological DistressVirtual RealityCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionFollow-Up StudiesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalCOVID-19digital technologypsychological stressself-help technologyvirtual realitywell-being

Identifiers

PMID34360479
PMCPMC8346162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.