SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
The Burden of Burnout among Healthcare Professionals of Intensive Care Units and Emergency Departments during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interventions to Enhance COVID-19 Pandemic Health Literacy in Health Professionals: Systematic Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and the associated factors of burnout among the critical healthcare professionals during the post-pandemic era: a multi-institutional survey in Taiwan with a systematic review of the Asian literatures.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- The prevalence of burnout among pulmonologists or respiratory therapists pre- and post-COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Art Interventions to Mitigate Burnout in Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review.The Permanente journal · 2023Pooled it
- The Work Environment during Coronavirus Epidemics and Pandemics: A Systematic Review of Studies Using Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Designs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Enhancing Patient Safety in Critical Care Settings: Lessons from a Multidimensional Special Issue.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High Utilisation Behaviour in Emergency Departments: Predictors in Baixo Alentejo Region.Portuguese journal of public health · 2026Article
- The environmental cost of learning: COIntensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Psychosocial Impact of COVID-19 on Intensive Care Unit Personnel: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey Assessment Before, During, and After the First Peak.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Burnout Among Italian Medical Doctors: A Cross-Sectional Study on Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Gratification Post-COVID-19.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Burnout, PTSD, and Medical Error: The Medico-Legal Implications of the Mental Health Crisis Among Frontline Healthcare Professionals During COVID-19.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The experiences of doctors in Lesotho during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Burnout and Physical Symptoms in Healthcare Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Exploring burnout, resilience and the coping strategies among critical healthcare professionals in post-COVID Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- The relationship between rumination and job fatigue in pre-hospital emergency personnel: a cross-sectional study.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Fit2Perform: European society of thoracic surgery survey on member well-being.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Quality of Work Life Determinants of Healthcare Professionals' Quiet Quitting: Towards Individual Difference.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A qualitative report on the experiences of physicians during the pandemic of COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2025Article
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary aim was to evaluate the burnout prevalence among healthcare workers (HCWs) in intensive care units (ICUs) and emergency departments (EDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The secondary aim was to identify factors associated with burnout in this population. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines by searching PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, and Scopus from 1 January to 24 November 2020. Studies with information about burnout prevalence/level during the pandemic regarding ICU/ED HCWs were eligible. A total of 927 records were identified. The selection resulted in 11 studies. Most studies were conducted in April/May 2020. Samples ranged from 15 to 12,596 participants. The prevalence of overall burnout ranged from 49.3% to 58%. Nurses seemed to be at higher risk. Both socio-demographic and work-related features were associated with burnout. Many pandemic-related variables were associated with burnout, e.g., shortage in resources, worry regarding COVID-19, and stigma. This review highlighted a substantial burnout prevalence among ICU/ED HCWs. However, this population has presented a high burnout prevalence for a long time, and there is not sufficient evidence to understand if such prevalence is currently increased. It also outlined modifiable factors and the need to improve emergency preparedness both from an individual and structural level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.