Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34360360›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Comparative Efficacy of Active Group Music Intervention versus Group Music Listening in Alzheimer's Disease.

María Gómez-Gallego, Juan Cándido Gómez-Gallego, María Gallego-Mellado, Javier García-García

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Gómez-GallegoClinical Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Saint Anthony, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Juan Cándido Gómez-GallegoApplied Economics Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
María Gallego-MelladoEspinardo Primary Health Care Centre, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Javier García-GarcíaClinical Neuroscience Research Group, Faculty of Economics, Catholic University of Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Universidad de Murcia · ESUniversidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusic interventions are promising therapies for the management of symptoms in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Globally, music interventions can be classified as active or receptive depending on the participation of the subjects. Active and receptive music tasks engage different brain areas that might result in distinctive clinical effects. This study aims to compare the clinical effects of two types of music interventions and a control activity.

methodsNinety AD patients from six nursing homes participated in the study. Nursing homes were randomly and blindly assigned to receive either active music intervention, receptive music intervention, or the usual care. Effects on cognition, behaviour, daily living activities, and motor function were assessed.

resultsActive music intervention improved cognition, behaviour, and functional state in a higher extent than both receptive music intervention and usual care. The effect size of active music intervention for cognitive deficits and behavioural symptoms was large (η

conclusionsActive music intervention is useful to improve symptoms of AD and should be prescribed as a complement to the usual treatment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseMusicMusic TherapyActivities of Daily LivingHumansNursing Homesactive music interventionAlzheimer’s diseasebehaviourcognitiondaily living activitiesmotor functionreceptive music intervention

Identifiers

PMID34360360
PMCPMC8345612
OpenAlexW3183872535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.